Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: V$gas.Com who wrote (39935)	3/3/2000 7:30:00 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

V$gas......................................... You should print the post. Call either Wheeler or Henry and ask him to discuss each point. Any point that neither IR person can discuss or is unwillingly to discussed should be complained about directly to IR and if you go to the share holder's mtg directly to RG. Most of the info that W. writes doesn't appear to be material. However, items about Coke's satisfaction and possible broader participation by Coke and its subsidiaries should be disseminated to all shares holders at the same time, and not to those who live nearby. If RG is making stock price projections and revenue projections, I think there is both a danger of over optimism on the part of RG and embellishment or misinterpretation as literal a hypothetical statement on the part of the person doing the reporting. For example, Cantwell noted in one of his post some timeback that RG made a facetious price projection several years ago, and the facetiousness of RG's comments were lost upon certain shareholders. For example, RG previously mentioned the ROnald McDonald house as an example of the type of charity tsig would like to partner with, yet some mistook his statement as the announcement of a done deal. For example, I attended the shareholders meeting last summer that lasted from 5 to 7 PM, yet W. reported he attended the same mtg that lasted until much later. I would construe that if RG made any comments about stock price or revenues from forthcoming deals that these are hypothetical ruminations over eagerly being presented as materials "facts". Speaking with Gordon, in person and on the phone, can lead anyone to understand how his words can be easily misconstrued and misrepresented. You'd think Gordon would have learned by now that his ebullience that is such an asset as a salesman can be a liability as a businessman. This quick assessment of Gordon's personality made from only brief interactions and a lot of second hand sources, is what made me so elated about the installement of Keegan's new management team primarily because it allows RG to concentrate on what he's good at and that is salesmanship...which, at times, to those not critical when doing diligence or healthily skeptical enough, is a bit too good. z

To: V$gas.Com who wrote (39935)	3/3/2000 7:37:00 PM
From: johngmack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

V$gas, I'm always interested in hearing objective opinions, but in this case I must be a little slow. Can you please help me understand a couple of things? First, why do you want the SEC to nail Bob's ass? Did you have some specific proof that was submitted, and if so, what's the progress of the complaint? Next, you recently posted something along the line of "all SI TISG posters just sit at their screens all day and don't have a life". V$gas, I post on this SI thread, have a life and don't watch the screen all day, so from my perspective your credibility sucks. I may be off a bit, but it seems like there about ten posts on RB for every one on SI. A lot of RB's posts are from people making multiple posts. If that's the case, maybe some of those posters on RB are watching the screen all day and don't have much of a life. Just a thought. I'm planning to attend the upcoming shareholder's meeting. As a long term investor in TSIG, are you planning to attend? If so, maybe you and Bob and I can get together to clarify what's real and what's not. Looking forward to your response. John