Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/4/2000 8:11:00 PM
From: pz	Respond to of 10293

Bill, ROFLMAO.....getting a bit hot in the kitchen huh? May this thread rest in peace, where it belongs. Paul

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/4/2000 9:15:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Respond to of 10293

Wow, Pink and now you? And we learn that Anthony might be gone in two months' time. What a dark week for SI.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/4/2000 10:43:00 PM
From: Blue On Black	Respond to of 10293

Bill, If I might be so bold...perhaps you might still post. While I agree that the thread has become useless for meaningful discussion because of the one hit wonders that have become market mavens when their personal scam runs to a degree, your insights will be missed. I have, recently, come to believe that 'peoplemarks' are much more useful than 'subjectmarks'. I do appreciate your views and do get some degree of entertainment from the lice that you draw. The froth will end... lee

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/5/2000 12:02:00 AM
From: brad greene	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Good Bye Bill, You wrote....."So I am retiring permanently from posting on SI". Is this really true?.....or just another bad call? What a loss for all of your loyal fan. <g> bg

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/5/2000 3:00:00 AM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 10293

Just a minor correction, Bill. The MWS.com site is run by Executrade now, which is setting up an online trading service also at executradeonline.com. If you want to post occasionally on the 50% Gains thread with ideas, the atmosphere is a good deal.......clearer over there. See ya Monday.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/5/2000 8:59:00 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

At least the cost of the site and the monitoring of its chat effectively bars the nitwits..... If that were so you would not be able to afford the tariff. I have noticed that this thread has deteriorated into nothing more than a constant barrage of insults by scam stock-touting cretins. It never appeared that you had a problem with insults, only that you wanted them to go one way. In the words of Yogi..."deja vu all over again."

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/5/2000 11:31:00 AM
From: ProDeath	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Thanks for letting us know where you are headed. I have enjoyed and benefited from your commentary and look forward to continuing to do so. Your thread is one of several on SI which seems to have a growing infestation of shrill shills, whoring promoters, and morons who simply can't live with the contrary opinions of others. If I needed this sort of cr*p I would be on Duhhoo or Raging Stool; I don't waste my time on either one of those places. There is a great opportunity out there for someone to create a quality forum for serious investors. One of the elements of such a forum should be an aggressive policy of banning known professional promoters and posters who persist in personal attacks. I'm running out of reasons to use SI. Once again, Bill, thanks for your efforts and I hope to see you in a more civilized venue shortly.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/5/2000 4:18:00 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Dear Bill: Bye, I'll miss you. It does get nasty once in awhile but often funny too. Dont know the site you mentioned and dont belong. JDN

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/6/2000 1:13:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 10293

Bye Bill. Was this voluntary? Take heart, you can still short VLNC at 100. (g)

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/6/2000 9:33:00 AM
From: Dr. Seuss	Respond to of 10293

Hey Bill, Haven't talked in quite a while... Just wanted to thank you for all you've done. For all the good times (back when they were good)...here's to you. Dr. Seuss

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/6/2000 2:54:00 PM
From: nealm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Bill, Thanks for the tips (I got in on COST at $44), and good luck in the future in your new venue. I haven't agreed on all your calls, but have enjoyed examing your methodology. Neal

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/6/2000 3:28:00 PM
From: wm sharp	Respond to of 10293

Tail between legs, it looks like he's off to the genuine doghouse. Let me get this straight: All sorts of folks on SI - except Bill Wexler - are "spreading lies and misleading information"? Laughed so hard, I sprayed my monitor screen with coffee. Thanks, Wexler. The comic relief was worth the cleanup hassle.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/6/2000 4:24:00 PM
From: Bob Trocchi	Respond to of 10293

Bill... Thanks and good luck. I enjoyed your thread, will miss it and I have profited from it. Thanks again. Bob T.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/7/2000 8:35:00 PM
From: Tom C	Respond to of 10293

Thanks Bill, I don't short stocks since I don't have a margin account and I don't day trade. I followed this thread (lurking) mostly for your long calls. You made me money and I owe you. I guess I'll have to sign up at your new location. Regards Tom

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	3/10/2000 6:27:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Mr.Wexler pardon me-my French... "Au revoir" indeed-Who do you think you are fooling with your kakameniatic fables? You were spotted today dealing and wheeling IFMX.Of course if one deals in fractions of 49 and 256 all day long with oversized fingers -no time is left to spoon feed all the tea boys and gutter girls back in the bitching pond. Stop cloaking up the digital waves with your penny works!

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (7068)	2/9/2003 9:04:17 AM
From: da_cheif™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

DUHHHHHH I CHANGED MY (MIND)?...LMAZOFF To:Bill Wexler who wrote (20981) From: Bill Wexler Thursday, Sep 28, 2000 10:35 AM View Replies (5) \| Respond to of 25844 RETRACTION In a previous message on this bulletin board, I stated that Valence is a "stock fraud" and is run by "crooks." In fact, this is false. Valence is now producing commercial quantities of batteries from its Mallusk, Northern Ireland plant on an automated assembly line and is rapidly ramping up its production. This, and other information about Valence is available to the public in public filings available at www.sec.gov and on their website at www.valence.com. I apologize to Valence's management, employees and share holders, and regret publishing this false information."