Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (42266)	3/5/2000 10:00:00 AM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

Rarebird: I am not disputing your position, just defending folks right to discuss fundamentals on this thread without being insulted... LG

To: Rarebird who wrote (42266)	3/5/2000 12:43:00 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Hi Rarebird .. I see that you are not doing the full "two step boogie" yet.. That tells me that we are not at the top yet. Anyway .. your question about FA. Some day .. (when that will be nobody knows) this whole fluff thing is gonna do the "burn baby burn" dance. So the FA question is valid for a long term view. When the bubble breaks the only thing that will be left will be stocks that have real value to them. Even they will be greatly underpriced then. But they will still exist. Meantime .. LG is one of the last persons to be looking at FA. He's made a lot of money in these markets. Now then .. FA .. I look a supply/demand for a stock .. is that FA or TA? I look at available money to fund the willing buyers .. FA or TA? Looking at a 10Q and P/E would fit within the FA area, I agree. I also consider cash on hand and degree of future obligations. So then .. some folks that I know work it like this: TA for some fast clip gains .. take a small portion of the gain for a FA move. lather rinse repeat .. as long as the bubble continues up they have more and more of the fast gains to contribute to their FA kinds of stocks. Does that make sense to you?