SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (100369)3/6/2000 12:40:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
John, >Two years ago, if you had told
me that AMD would beat Intel to a 1 Gig processor, I would have LOL. So something has changed, it's either a giant step
forward for AMD or a step backwards for Intel.


In fairness, it's more the former. Look at the clock speeds of the microprocessors of today from either Intel or AMD vs. two or three years ago. Nobody else is close (Sun, IBM, Apple).

I've heard Andy Grove say several times that competition is good for Intel, and will make them better. I believe that.

CNBC, on AMD right now, saying that 1 GHz means a chip can process a billion bits of data a second. Gee, put a pretty face up there and they can say anything they want (wasn't Maria).

Tony



To: Road Walker who wrote (100369)3/6/2000 1:49:00 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dear John: I understand AMD reached 1 gb by overclocking the computer. If that is true, I imagine there are probably about 6 posters on this thread who could do the same. So what? You pay top $$ for a system that will not last due to overclocking. I am not impressed. If that is how INTC reaches theirs I will not be impressed with them either. JDN