SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (14780)3/10/2000 12:23:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Oh that's the problem. You don't like Bush because you are spectacularly misinformed about who his advisors are.

In the case of GWB, he seems to be hemmed in tightly by his father, a paid shill for the Moonies; theocratician Pat Robertson; and his ethics advisor Marvin Olasky, whose notions on social ethics are based on a belief that the Bible is inerrant.

You democrats better get your story straight. Is Bush in the pocket of the establishment, or wacko fringers? Can't be both ya know.



To: E who wrote (14780)3/10/2000 12:25:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
>>In the case of GWB, he seems to be hemmed in
tightly by his father, a paid shill for the Moonies; theocratician Pat Robertson; and his ethics advisor Marvin Olasky, whose notions on social
ethics are based on a belief that the Bible is inerrant. And that's just the gang active in the social policy advice-giving sector of W's
entourage.<<

Wow, quite a display of religious intolerance, I'd say. Help me out on this, what exactly is "social policy"? And how is it currently being implemented?

bp



To: E who wrote (14780)3/10/2000 12:30:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Referring to Bush pere as a "paid shill of the Moonies" is egregious, even if one disapproves of his association with them; Pat Robertson is not "an advisor"; and Marvin Olasky wrote a book on the effects of '60 liberationism on the poor that is generally respected, even by non-Evangelicals. You are turning out to be quite the bigot......