SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (14793)3/10/2000 8:27:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Do you have a
problem with someone consulting an ethics advisor?

I certainly do. Ethics in a mature man or woman should be ingrained, instinctual, autonomous. To modify or adjust one's ethics to a particular situation on the advice of a hired gun is the lowest form of moral dependency. I always liked Davy Crockett's (that Alamo hero) "Decide what's right and go ahead." I don't see any consultation in Patrick Henry's speech: "I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" At his age, GWB should not need ethical advice, but after all his serious moral lapses he obviously feels he does. We know Clinton is under the moral care of a bunch of preachers, and apparently Bush has the same need.
I would prefer a president who knows what's right and goes ahead.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (14793)3/11/2000 1:07:00 AM
From: E  Respond to of 769667
 
I don't feel like repeating myself. I've made clear what I "have a problem with." As for your comment

<<<You seem to confuse "intolerance" with an "adherence" to one's own beliefs. You can certainly
adhere to your own beliefs and tolerate the beliefs of others, certainly not mutually exclusive.>>>

Why are you telling me this? It is something any child knows.

BTW, Senior proposed that atheists couldn't really be considered citizens.