Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (19951)	3/12/2000 11:18:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

>> under what circumstances would a satellite based wireless telephone be "a need" (rather than "a want")? Do you remember the earthquake in Taiwan? A number of US businesses were out of touch with their Taiwan based subsidiaries for several days. I can see a sat phone becoming a standard item on the emergency preparedness list for offshore fabs. uf

To: kumar who wrote (19951)	3/13/2000 3:36:00 AM
From: BirdDog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Are there other categories of users I have overlooked ? Satellite works wonders in the Mountains. Probably cheaper than a cell site outside every bear's den. RaPle

To: kumar who wrote (19951)	3/13/2000 8:18:00 AM
From: Apollo	Respond to of 54805

What is the need for Sat-based cell phones? Good morning Kumar. I'm no expert on this one, but from following the discussion since last summer, reasons that have been pointed out are as follows: 1. the majority of underdeveloped countries have little telecommunications infrastructure, and whole towns could benefit from Satellite-based cell phone service (ie, like phone booths);easier to establish than even a base-station cell phone service (aka qualcomm) 2. remote areas of the world, mountains, oceans, etc. 3. theoretically, just one phone could work everywhere; which is not presently true of any system. There must be some benefit, since everyone keeps trying to build a satellite system. Iridium will soon announce bankruptcy. Globalstar is up and running. ICOS just had there first satellite launch plunge into the sea over the weekend. Qualcomm has about a 7% stake in sat-based wireless. The Globalstar thread would be a good starting point. Check out posts by Maurice Winn, among others. Stan

To: kumar who wrote (19951)	3/13/2000 11:20:00 AM
From: John Stichnoth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

GSTRF--Market need This is a good time to be talking about G* again, since the stock price is so weak, and we might not have too long to wait to see if this is going to work. Hopefully, we'll start to see some numbers start to trickle out with March 31 earnings. On your question: Some areas of need (in no particular order)-- 1. Farmers on large midwestern farms spend the day out of range of the cell system. They rely today on two-way radios, which limits their flexibility. 2. Wilderness tour operators. An anecdote was just posted on the G* thread of a tour operator who ordered 7 phones, for use at each of his base camps. Previously, he was basically out of touch with his various operations, short of going and visiting them personally. 3. "Vertical industries"--such as mining and forestry, where the operations are often out of range of normal telecom infrastructures. 4. The hundreds of thousands (or, millions?) of villages around the world that have no telecom at all. Mexico has announced a program to provide subsidized fixed satellite service in some villages. Telecomm service has been demonstrated to be a huge economic enabler. 5. Any area not served by cellular. Note that even in the US, half of the land mass is still not covered by cellular. 6. Maritime. Present services either are radio (which limits usefulness, since someone on the other end has to have a radio too), or GEO (which suffers from the voice delay caused by the distance the signal has to travel--and therefore sounds "wierd"). 7. Emergency services. In my town, believe it or not, just 12 miles from Manhattan, there are dead spots in the cellular footprint. 8. Catastrophe service. E.g., Mozambique flood relief? Telecomm is the definition of enabling technology. Any improvement in communication enables greater productivity. To the extent stellite wireless improves communication, it is very much satisfying a need, rather than a want. The issue with G* is not whether there are people out there with a need. The key questions that the market has at this point are: 1. Are there enough users out there, with both the need and the cash, to cover G's costs? 2. Can G successfully address this market? (They don't have a history as a marketing organization). 3. Can we believe Bernie Schwartz any longer, since he has overstated (lied?) so often in the past? Best, John