Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Corner Bay Silver (BAY.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nexus who wrote (716)	3/14/2000 12:28:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4409

<<No need to get so defensive.>> Where do you read that I am defensive. Just expressing my view of the current situation. (Keep in mind I think in French and try to translate in english... so sometimes it may not come out exactly as I think it should). <<and I was just wondering if something went wrong recently considering the recent selloff.>> The only thing that is wrong is Kaiser telling his subscriber to sell 25% of their holdings in BAY a few weeks ago. Even if I disagree with his calculation of BAY's net asset value, I think his call made sense since his subscribers were in at a very low price. I think he still have a target of $6 on a probable takeover later this year. <<BTW, I will spare you any comparison with my 'favorite' as there IS no comparison. Potential, potential, potential.>> Hum, well then would you like to comment on the potential of Francisco new acquisitions. It should be easy as they took exactly the same format as PFG to report on surface results: carlsononline.com And about Cumberland, if I just tell you that they (and partners) already have 9 millions ounces almost proven on their properties and that the potential of their gold district is certainly for 20-40 millions ounces in several high grade deposits. Cumberland, like FGX, but unlike PFG, is not being promoted.