To: goldsnow who wrote (16272 ) 3/18/2000 6:44:00 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17770
As I put it on this thread a couple of years ago:Americans are racist people who nurse their racism whereas Europeans (and Brazilians) are repressed xenophobes... Here's a firsthand testimony by an African-American journalist who had an online chat with readers of The Washington Post :washingtonpost.com At some point of the discussion, the journalist lays his profession of faith in the U.S. fabric open:Adams Morgan: After living in Brazil for such an extended period of time how did you then begin to see America, with an appreciation, contempt, or indifference, did you see yourself differently, and would you recommend an experience such as yours to african-american youngsters to allow them to see themselves outside of the limited constructs created for them by America. Eugene Robinson: After my experiences in Brazil, I came to appreciate the U.S. context more, despite its many flaws. And I definitely came to see myself differently. There was never a time in my past when I ever rejected my racial heritage, but there was a time when I wanted to de-emphasize it, when I wanted to believe it just didn't matter. I gradually came to an acceptance of the fact that it did matter, and that in many ways it should matter at this stage in our history. A shorthand way of putting it, I guess, was that I became more comfortable in my own skin. [snip] Here's an instructive chat on today's racism within European soccer:risc.uni-linz.ac.at Goldsnow, In a previous post to Neocon you said that I didn't believe in the nationalist/jingoistic/patriotic fantasy purporting that some American-pie-community spirit gathers American citizens across the social fabric.... That's partially right for, as a Leftist-Anarchist, I do believe indeed in the perpetuity of the so-called class warfare --however subtle become the different strata of society (white/blue collar, petty/upper bourgeoisie, symbolic analyst, blocked ascendants, etc., etc.). Yet, to claim that --ultimately-- "it's not a matter of color" is, by me, a bit far-fetched: I'd rather say that, in order to divide and conquer its subservient working class, the bourgeoisie uses all available means, including the color line. That's more blatant the higher up you look at the social ladder: take a big corporation that has to pick out its next CEO (or COO, CFO, whatever top exec) among a dozen plausible candidates. At that level of power play, we shouldn't expect that all these Type-A contending personalities will refrain from using every possible trick to sweep their way to the corporate top.... So, if one candidate --otherwise qualified and suitable for the top job-- happens to be black, or female, or lesbian, or bald, or whatever, that "taint" will be pinned on her. It's merely Gen. Colin Powell's overkill strategy applied to the corporate rat race.... Gus.