SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Conolog Cp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jjs64 who wrote (94)3/18/2000 4:53:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 428
 
"I felt highly misled by OTCFN's representations on the number of SEXI shares. If the company won't tell you who the transfer agent is, consider that a red flag."

Message 395225
To: Linda Brandt (38 )
From: Chuck Bragg Monday, Oct 28 1996 6:40PM ET
Reply # of 77

WARNING TO ALL POTENTIAL BUYERS OF THIS STOCK

OTC Financial Network (aka. OTC Communications) is a promoter of this stock. My experience with OTCFN has resulted in numerous material misstatements by this PR firm in regards to a stock named Systems of Excellence, which was represented by OTCFN. During that time, Geoff Eiten, partner at OTCFN, mistated the number of common shares outstanding to me on 3 occasions. It was only after I did further research that he finally admitted the additional shares. He denied reports that the NASDAQ has denied Systems of Excellence (SEXI) a listing, when in fact they had been denied. He told shareholders that SEXI had a $130 million deal with the State of Florida which never came to fruition. And probably on his worst offense, he told me on Friday, October 4th that all SEC problems had been solved and that the company had indeed signed the deal with the State of Florida. This, as anyone following the SEXI saga would know, was a blatant lie. On Monday, October 7th, the SEC halted SEXI trading. Finally, Mr. Eiten had been telling shareholders all along that all the shares being issued were for restricted stock. However, a call placed to the transfer agent this week confirmed that most of the company's shares are not restricted. OTCFN has a dismal record of disseminating accurate and truthful information in my opinion.

If you are thinking about investing in a company in which OTCFN represents, I would very carefully examine the company, and certainly not rely on anything this PR firm has to say. If you're a current shareholder, I have no bone to pick with the company. But if you're relying purely on information given out by OTCFN, you might want to start asking some very tough questions. Incidentally, you can call your company's transfer agent and find out the current number of shares. This information is considered public. I felt highly misled by OTCFN's representations on the number of SEXI shares. If the company won't tell you who the transfer agent is, consider that a red flag.
==================================================

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934RELEASE NO. 37791 / October 7, 1996
The Securities and Exchange Commission today ordered the
temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), of trading in the
securities of Systems of Excellence, Inc. ("SOE"), beginning at
9:00 a.m. EDT on October 7, 1996 and concluding at 11:59 p.m. EDT
on October 21, 1996. SOE is located in Coral Gables, Florida and
Mclean, Virginia. The Commission ordered this trading suspension because of
questions raised as to the adequacy and accuracy of publicly-
disseminated information concerning, among other things: (1)
SOE's reported financial condition; (2) the existence and value
of services rendered to SOE in exchange for stock issued by SOE;
(3) whether stock was issued by SOE to consultants without
registration; (4) the reasons for changes in SOE's independent
accountants; and (5) SOE's sales of its video teleconferencing
products. The Commission determined that the public interest and
the protection of investors requires a suspension of trading inSOE securities.
The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and
prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the
foregoing information along with all other currently available
information and any information subsequently issued by thecompany.
Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact
that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act, at the
termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be
entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of
the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer has any
questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he
should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff
of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. If
any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule
15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to
SOE's securities until such time as he has familiarized himself
with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been
met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in
violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for
prompt enforcement action. 



To: jjs64 who wrote (94)3/18/2000 6:55:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 428
 
News to pumpdiddilyump by;

CNLG : CONOLOG CORP (NASDAQ)

BW 03/16 08:40 Conolog Introduces DSP Pilot Tone Transmitter Designed Specifically for General Electric NS40 Upgrade


BW 03/15 08:30 Conolog Appoints New Head of Professional Graphics Staffing 'PGS' Subsidiary -- New PGS Office Opens --


BW 03/10 14:29 Conolog Announces Registration Statement Declared Effective for Publicly Traded Warrants


BW 03/09 14:38 Conolog Awarded Three-year Contract for Its Military Radio Switch -- Value Estimated at $1.6 Million


BW 03/08 08:28 Conolog Announces Filing of Registration Statement for Publicly Traded Warrants


BW 03/03 08:26 Conolog to Expand Asian Market


BW 03/01 08:32 Conolog Introduces Cost-Effective Single Analog DSP Transmission Channel for Real-Time Data Collection


BW 02/28 10:30 Conolog Adds Active Hi-Voltage Switching and Line-Signal Interconnect to its PTR 1500 DSP Systems for Electric Utilities


BW 02/25 14:34 Conolog Enters Into Preliminary Merger Discussions With VXI Associates


BW 02/22 13:07 Conolog Announces Completion of Second Order for Military Radio Switch


BW 02/17 14:50 Conolog Adds China, Asia, South Pacific to Canadian Marketing & Distribution Agreements for Its DSP Products


BW 02/14 09:17 EquityAlert.com Announces Investment Opinion, No. 4 of 8


BW 02/10 16:33 Conolog Corporation Announces Second Quarter Results


BW 02/10 16:31 Conolog Corporation Announces Second Quarter Results


BW 02/09 10:18 Conolog Introduces Fiber Optic PTR 1500 Quad System for U.S. and Canadian Electric Utilities


BW 02/08 09:18 EquityAlert.com Announces Investment Opinion, No. 3 of 8


BW 02/07 09:23 EquityAlert.com Announces Investment Opinion, No. 4 of 8


BW 02/07 08:46 Conolog Announces $300,000 DSP Orders For Illinois D.O.T. Highway Network Expansion


BW 02/04 11:33 Conolog Corporation Introduces Fiber Optic Capability to Its Digital Signal Processing --DSP-- Products


BW 02/03 14:36 Conolog Corporation Initiates Talks With GeoComm International Corporation


Next



To: jjs64 who wrote (94)3/18/2000 7:48:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 428
 
I notice you're a devout Truthseeker follower. A review of your past posts shows you've been following him to lots of places.

A short follower of Truthseeker, I suppose you already know the public relations firm for ZSUN is the same as the one utilized by CNLG. Thus, I ask: Are we Conolog investors innocently caught in Truthseeker's vindictive drift against ZSUN via Conolog's, public relations firm?

Message 12354795

What exactly are you defending in the link above? Would you care to comment on the results of that lawsuit?

signonsandiego.com

Of course, it was ZSUN's pressure via the court which made the face of Truthseeker a bit beet red, was it not? Didn't Truthsayer, in fact, have to eat his words by publicly disavowing his comments relative to ZSUN, by order of the court? And didnd't Truthseeker have to repeat his admissions because you failed to initially conform with the court order?

Lots of questions. Lotsa, lotsa a questions. Ironic, however, no matter how twisted the past vendettas, no matter how distorted becomes the technical or legalise material, no matter they may even have been a guilty party in there somewhere on some other stock, or some allegation against someone involving a current stock...we always find the same roads ultimately leading to an organized and concerted shorting campaign spearheaded by the likes of: The Truthseeker and Auric Goldinger.

Again, whatever happened to the concept of a fair up and a fair down? I hope Conolog has you folks sized up real good come trading time this week.

Perhaps it's time, perhaps even appropriate, to spam the the following message to threads everywhere: Short squeeze coming on Conolog!



To: jjs64 who wrote (94)3/18/2000 11:59:00 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 428
 
Question - What do you do when you have no basis to bash a stock? You take old news - pretend its new -- and keep posting the same stuff over and over.

Here's the real truth on the Truthseeker

ZiaSun critic told to halt Net smears


By Bruce V. Bigelow
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
February 9, 2000

SAN DIEGO -- A San Diego judge has ordered a self-styled stock critic to stop posting critical messages about a Solana Beach investor in an Internet "cybersmearing" case that is gaining widespread attention.

Lawsuits filed to halt the so-called stock bashers have raised questions about free speech on the Internet and prompted news accounts about the issue.

The temporary order prohibits Floyd D. Schneider of Saddle River, N.J., from stating or suggesting that Bryant Cragun of Solana Beach is dishonest, disreputable or a criminal.

Cragun, an investor and stock promoter, sued Schneider last year as part of a bid to douse an Internet flame war that has been raging over ZiaSun Technologies, an obscure holding company backed by Cragun.

The Jan. 31 order by Superior Court Judge Janis Sammartino also required Schneider to publish a retraction of several press releases he issued on the Internet, which announced "a strong sell recommendation" on ZiaSun.

According to the court's order, which was uncontested, Schneider's sell recommendation "was not based on an objective analysis of ZiaSun's stock and value."

The order also says that "derogatory statements made regarding Bryant Cragun, ZiaSun, and the officers, directors and employees of ZiaSun were false or implied false facts."

Cragun's lawyer, Daniel Pascucci, alleged that Schneider is a part of a group of eight Internet users who are working in a conspiracy with short sellers to drive down the price of ZiaSun shares.

"You can't say whatever you want to on the Internet or anywhere else," Pascucci said. "It's kind of like yelling 'Fire!' in a theater, and then charging an exit fee when people panic and are running for the exits."

Using aliases such as "truthseeker" and "Auric Goldfinger," members of the "ZiaSun 8" have posted thousands of taunting, scornful messages about ZiaSun in Internet stock chat forums.

Some of the messages mock ZiaSun's financial statements, detail the company's ties to Asian brokerage houses and reveal ZiaSun's prior incarnations as BestWay and Carlisle Enterprises.

Pascucci says the "ZiaSun 8" -- and Schneider in particular -- have posted defamatory statements about ZiaSun and Cragun, falsely claiming that the company is under investigation and Cragun is a criminal.

In response to a reporter's question, Pascucci acknowledged that Cragun was the subject of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission that lasted for years. But no charges were filed, and Pascucci said emphatically that Cragun is not a criminal.

Schneider denied that he has been working with short sellers, or that he has worked closely with Amr "Tony" Elgindy, identified in Cragun's lawsuit as a Nasdaq short seller.

"I do mortgages for a living," said Schneider, a regional vice president with Real Estate Mortgage Network. "And I do investigative reports on companies -- and I'm very good at it."

Schneider said he publishes his investigations on his own Internet Web site, thetruthseeker.com, including reports he prepared on USA Talks and 2TheMart.com.

Schneider said he has not contested Cragun's lawsuit because he can't afford it. (RRUFFF note - THIS IS THE FUNNIEST PART. THIS HUGELY SELF-SUCCESSFUL TURD CAN'T EVEN AFFORD TO DEFEND HIMSELF. LMAO)

ZiaSun, which trades over the counter, represents itself as an Internet company that operates at least nine business units focused on e-commerce and specialized online support service.

The Solana Beach company recently obtained a separate order from a U.S. District Court in Seattle, which prohibits Schneider from publishing "false statements" about ZiaSun.

The order stemmed from a libel lawsuit the company filed last year against Schneider and the seven other Internet users.