SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Edwarda who wrote (75828)3/19/2000 3:02:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
britannica.com

ENCYCLOP’DIA BRITANNICA


Irish monasticism

Although monks and monasteries were to be found in Ireland at the time of Patrick, their place was then altogether secondary. But in the course of the 6th and 7th centuries a comprehensive monastic system developed in Ireland, partly through the influence of Celtic monasteries in Britain, such as Candida Casa at Whithorn in Galloway and Llangarvan in Wales. Early attempts to organize the Irish church on the usual Roman system--by which each bishop and his clergy exercised exclusive jurisdiction within a diocese--seem to have given way to one in which groups of Christian settlements were loosely linked together, usually under the auspices of some one or other of the great saints. Careful study of the lives of the early saints reveals the manner in which their reputations developed in proportion to the power of the political dynasties that became connected with them.

By the end of the 6th century, enthusiasm for Christianity was leading Irishmen to devote themselves to a most austere existence as monks, as hermits, and as missionaries to pagan tribes in Scotland and the north of England and in a great area of west-central Europe, particularly between the Rhine, Loire, and Rh“ne rivers. St. Columba's foundation (c. 563) of the monastery of Iona off the northwest Scottish coast provided the best-known base for the Celtic Christianization of Scotland; and its offshoot, Lindisfarne, lying off the coast of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Northumbria, was responsible for the conversion of that area. Of the continental missionaries, the best known is St. Columban (c. 543-615), whose monastic foundations at Luxeuil near Annegray in the Vosges and at Bobbio in northern Italy became important centres of learning. Columban, however, by his individualism and austere puritanism, came into conflict not only with the Merovingian rulers of Gaul but also with the local ecclesiastical administration; his limitations exemplify those of the Irish monastic system as a whole and explain why, in the end, it was supplanted by the ordinary administrative system of the church.

Learning and art

Both at home and abroad the saints were succeeded by scholars, whose work in sacred and classical studies and particularly in elaborating an Irish Christian mythology and literature was to have profound effects on the Irish language and was to be a major factor in its survival. The Irish monasteries became notable centres of learning; in Ireland itself those of Clonmacnoise (in County Offaly) and Clonard (in County Meath) were among the most famous. Christianity had brought to Ireland the Latin tongue and command of the Latin authors; not only Church Fathers but also classical writers were read and studied. Irish scribes produced manuscripts written in the clear hand known as Insular; this usage spread from Ireland to Anglo-Saxon England and to Irish monasteries on the Continent. Initial letters in the manuscripts were illuminated, usually with intricate ribbon and zoomorphic designs. The most famous of the Irish manuscripts is the Book of Kells, a copy of the four Gospels probably dating from the late 8th to the early 9th century. The earliest surviving illuminated manuscript, the Book of Durrow, was probably made about a century earlier.

The adoption of Christianity made it necessary to relate the chronology of Irish tradition, history, and genealogies to the events recorded in the Bible. The Book of Invasions (Leabhar Gabh la), in which Irish history was linked with events in the Old Testament, was a notable example of this process. In this way Latin civilization in Ireland became linked to the Gaelic; and the association became closer under the impact of the Viking wars. Gradually the Latin products of the Christian schools became replaced by Irish works; Latin lives of the saints, for example, are almost always earlier in date than those written in Irish. Recurring bouts of puritanism and reforming movements in the church tended to remove secular literature from monastic control; ultimately there developed a class of professional families who were its custodians from the 12th to the 17th century. The medieval secular writers, employing a degenerate form of Old Irish usually known as Middle Irish, were responsible for a large proportion of Irish literary achievement; their historical works, the annals, and the great genealogies, supplemented by the law collections, have enabled historians to reconstruct early Irish social history.

The Norse invasions and their aftermath

The first appearance of the Norsemen on the Irish coast is recorded in 795. Thereafter the Norsemen made frequent plundering raids, sometimes far inland. They seized and fortified two ports, Annagassan and Dublin, in 838; and in the 840s they undertook a series of large-scale invasions in the north of the country. These invaders were driven out by Aed Finnliath, high king from 862 to 879, but meanwhile the Norse rulers of Dublin were reaching the zenith of their power. They took Waterford in 914 and Limerick in 920. Gradually, without quite abandoning piracy, the Vikings became traders in close association with the Irish, and their commercial towns became a new element in the life of the country. The decline of Norse power in the south began when they lost Limerick in 968 and was finally effected when the Scandinavian allies of the king of Dublin were defeated by High King Brian Boru at the Battle of Clontarf in 1014.

Although the Battle of Clontarf removed the prospect of Norse domination, it brought a period of political unsettlement. High kings ruled in Ireland but almost always "with opposition," meaning that they were not acknowledged by a minority of provincial kings. The Viking invasions had, in fact, shown the strength and the weakness of the Irish position. The fact that power had been preserved at a local level in Ireland enabled a maximum of resistance to be made; and, although the invaders established maritime strongholds, they never achieved any domination comparable to their control of eastern England or northwestern France. After Clontarf they remained largely in control of Ireland's commerce but came increasingly under the influence of neighbouring Irish kings.

In the 11th and 12th centuries the ecclesiastical reform movement of western Europe was extended into Ireland. And, as the kings of Munster and Connaught, Leinster and Ulster struggled each to secure the dominant position that had once been held by Brian Boru, they came to realize the value to them of alliance with the forces of church reform. Thus, with the aid of provincial rulers, the reformers were able to set up in Ireland a system of dioceses whose boundaries were coterminous with those of the chief petty kingdoms. At the head of this hierarchy was established the archbishopric of Armagh, in association with the province of Ulster dominated by the royal family of U¡ N‚ill. But the victory of the reformers was not complete, for the parochial system was not introduced until after the Anglo-Norman invasion. Moreover, the reformers sought to influence Irish conduct as well as church organization. The enormities of Irish moral behaviour were colourfully described by St. Bernard of Clairvaux in his life of his contemporary St. Malachy, the reforming bishop who introduced the Cistercian monks into Ireland. The reforming popes Adrian IV and Alexander III encouraged Henry II's invasion of Ireland, believing that it would further church reform in that country. In a remarkable account of the conquest, Gerald of Wales provided a lurid description of the archaic Irish civilization that the invaders encountered. The recognition of Henry II as lord of Ireland and the linking of the church to a foreign administration terminated the independence of Gaelic Ireland and reduced the country to a position of subordination for centuries to come.




To: Edwarda who wrote (75828)3/19/2000 3:19:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
As usual Edwarda, you are incomplete on historical (especially Tudor and Stuart) matters. The English heretics preferred to consider themselves members of the universal church mentioned in the credo, so they refused to cede the use of "Catholic" to their oppressors. Many bigshot Romish (or Papist) churchmen, in turn, resented being called Romish or Papist, so they eventually implicitly agreed to be called "Roman Catholic." In English speech, "Roman Catholic" is the polite and generally accepted term for the Romish, Papist (in CE terms) or Catholic (in continental Catholic terms).
The Catholic (sic!) Encyclopaedia explains the acceptance by Catholic authorities of "Roman Catholic" as follows:

The "Oxford Dictionary" is probably right in assigning the recognition of "Roman Catholic" as the official style of the adherents of the Papacy in England to the negotiations for the Spanish Match (1618-24). In the various treaties etc., drafted in connection with this proposal, the religion of the Spanish princess is almost always spoken of as "Roman Catholic".

BTW, all of this is irrelevant, as I will happily substitute "Papist" for "Roman Catholic" if this will lessen offense. I wasn't referring to the Protestant revolution in the 16th century, but to the Synod of Whitby (7th century) as reported by the Venerable Bede (referred to as the "Venomous Bede" in Seller and Yeatman's definitive 1066 and All That) a well-known Anglo-Saxon chronic. The Irish (or the Scots as they were called then, not to be confused with the Scots from whom St. Padraic had been kidnapped by the Irish (as they were then called)) faced the representatives of the Pope over the critical question of the date of Easter which the Irish had not kept up to date. The king decided for the Papists because a bird flew through the hall (illustrating the transience of avian life), and the English became Papists rather than Irish (which would have anticipated the United Kingdom -- at least so far as Armagh went. I hope this clears things up.