Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101389)	3/23/2000 2:37:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, <I believe Intel is smart enough to push RMBS off the stern if need be.> But Intel hasn't, despite what Carl (a.k.a. Bilow) is predicting Intel will do. That either means Intel isn't smart, or Rambus is still a very viable memory technology. You decide from there. Tenchusatsu

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101389)	3/23/2000 3:01:00 PM
From: Glenn Norman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Yo_Jim.................. RE:So where do you see the problem with Bilows post? I believe the problem with both Bilow and yourself is that you both seem to think there is no "Intelegent" decision makers within INTEL. It is obvious to me that INTEL made the decision to use RAMBUS technology long before you or Bilow knew anything about it, and that the people that made that decision are a whole hell of a lot smarter than you or Bilow. I read all of Bilow and DAN3's CR@P for months on the RAMBUS thread last year, and because I made the decision to believe the "powers-that-be" at INTEL instead of them I am now a RAMBUSAIRE many times over! Salude - Norman$$$