Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dealer who wrote (8921)	3/23/2000 6:35:00 PM
From: Voltaire	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 35685

Thread, I am not sure we would accomplish anything by splitting but hell, I don't care if that is what most want. I tell ya what. We always let the porch decide by committee. If ya want to split the thread then put Y for yes or N for at the end of your post. Don't make a post just to vote. Hey Dealer, I have another job for you. Volts

To: Dealer who wrote (8921)	3/23/2000 6:48:00 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Anyway for now he would like to leave it as is That's my vote also. I'd have to monitor both threads and it would be less efficient because of a large number of cross posts. The real reason the "natural home" split was that threads tend to establish a unique culture. When all the "new comers" arrived you had two incompatible cultures - a "house divided". While one may derisively refer to the S & P as the Self-righteous & Pompous, its primary function is to serve as a home for a community forged during the Holy Wars. This thread does not have the bifurcation that necessitated the Q split. Those of us that read both Q threads can attest to the duplication. So (if it doesn't offend southern sensibilities too much) I say "united we stand". Edit - vote N. lurking... lurqer