SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101530)3/25/2000 11:27:00 AM
From: Joey Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, re:
Fortunately, the average customer knows only Mhz (Mhz Sells TM McMannis)...so the segmentation thing works.

Different customer base Jim. Consumers who buy AMD chips know about overclocking! Just looking at the price difference & my estimate of the performance difference, there's no real segmentation here. Seems like a rushed strategy since Intel is cleaning AMD's clock in the retail "sweet spot": 500-700. Hmmmm, AMD's ASPs might be heading south for Spring. <g>

joey




To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101530)3/25/2000 1:55:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, <Fortunately, the average customer knows only Mhz (Mhz Sells TM McMannis)...so the segmentation thing works.>

I guess when 1 GHz Athlons show up in Costco, the segmentation thing gets trashed. I don't know why anyone who shops for Compaq systems at Costco would want a 1 GHz system, and I don't know why anyone who wants a 1 GHz system would shop at Costco for it. Like I said before, perhaps AMD is trying to target a market that cares more about 500 MHz Celerons (or even 600 MHz Athlon/Pentium III) than about 1 GHz Athlons.

Furthermore, what advantages will Spitfire have over Celeron or K6-2? People buying those kinds of systems are much more price-sensitive than MHz-hungry. Spitfire-based systems will still be more expensive than either Celeron or K6-2, especially Celerons paired up with the ultra-popular 810 chipset.

Perhaps Spitfire will displace some lower-end Athlons and lower-end Pentium III sales in the retail stores. But wait, aren't Pentium III systems scarce in retail anyway? Guess that means Athlon will be impacted more by Spitfire than Pentium III.

Tenchusatsu



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101530)3/25/2000 9:20:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
McMannis - Re:"Why bother with the Spitfire? I hear it's a lot cheaper to make than thunderbird..."

It should be cheaper than the Thump-a-burp - but is it cheaper to make than an AThWiper ?

Paul