To: Pluvia who wrote (8010 ) 3/25/2000 3:02:00 PM From: buffaloha Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18222
Perhaps Mr. Pluvia did not read Rogel's post? The truth from Rogel... By: Tyrannosaurus Reply To: 60688 by pklittlFriday, 17 Mar 2000 at 3:35 AM EST Post # of 61643 SafeTpay IS NOT competition! Hello everyone, this is Rogel from RG TECQ, INC. Although I am currently as busy as Tom Hughes in developing the leading edge technology that will surprise the world in a very short time, I feel strongly in rebutting any statement made by SafeTpay or about SafeTpay. The reason for this is because these ex-consultants of eConnect are trying to take advantage of the current situation with eConnect for personal profit - with stolen proprietary information AND equipment! The following statement was recently made: >TO ALL, Is this ECNC competition? I took this off of >the SafeTPay Web Site. The answer to this question, simply stated, is "NO". Why? Because everything that SafeTpay purports to own belongs to eConnect. o The trademark SAFETPAY belongs to Tom Hughes, the CEO of eConnect o The domain name SAFETPAY.COM belongs to RG TECQ, INC. because we have been given EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS to use and control any variation of the name SAFETPAY o The ATM technology that the former consultants of eConnect currently masquerading as "Safetpay.com" claims to own was designed and built by me, Rogel and my programmers, currently called RG TECQ, INC. o The FIRST Linux Transaction Server (LTS) built by RG TECQ, INC. for the exclusive use of eConnect is currently being held hostage by UPP Solutions in St. Petersburg, Florida because Harry Hargens has personal relationships with two employees of UPP Solutions - Michael Batsavage, Michael Crispin. These employees and UPP Solutions obviously approve of the tactic of stealing technology because they have REFUSED to return our LTS. I encourage anyone on the board who have a vested interest in eConnect to contact UPP Solutions and ask of the whereabouts of the eConnect LTS. Feel free to use any of the names I have listed above. It is difficult for me to fathom how the individuals who currently populate the company "Safetpay.com" can continue to do business in this country. It is as if the laws of propriety applies to everyone except them. Econnect PAID them as consultants, GAVE them stock options while they were consultants, and they repaid this act of kindness by attempting to profit from technology that rightfully belongs to eConnect. Most heinous of all is that while Tom is busy battling for the shareholders of eConnect by using all of his resources to clear eConnect of all of the false accusations currently being lobbied, SafeTpay.com is trying to take advantage of this weak moment by trying to bring to market ATM technology that belongs to eConnect via PATENTS and actual WORKING TECHNOLOGY! What SafeTpay.com is trying to do is the same as a person who decides one day to purchase a Chevrolet Corvette, go to his friend's body shop, change the NAME to SafeTpay.com Corvette, and then try to RE-SELL the car as the "new" SafeTpay.com Corvette. Completely ignoring General Motor's PATENTS and ACTUAL WORKING TECHNOLOGY. Then, if enough suckers actually buy the "new" SafeTpay.com Corvette, this person starts to accept investment monies for his "new" SafeTpay.com Corvette manufacturing plant. Is the picture clear now? As shareholders in eConnect, ALL of you should be outraged at this blatant action on the part of SafeTpay.com