Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wolff who wrote (3724)	3/27/2000 1:53:00 PM
From: Wolff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6847

2006 for adoption according to Garnter Group. A lot has been made about the ten technologies anticipated to get atttention by the Gartner Group. What is not often told is that wearable have been on that list for 3 years running. So far with questionable (best case) success. But what is not posted by the Pumper is that Gartner goes on to say that they do not anticipate wearable moving to the mainstream until 2006. IMO PALM will be a huge player, and will not be a stationary target like many assume. The Palms will get better and better, today they are the number one portable computing appliance. Hasta ============== Each year the Gartner Group identifies ten technologies that are expected to attract the most attention due to marketing hype, rapid technology evolution or growing application adoption. Wearable computers have been on that list for the past three years. Their analysts speculate that wearable computing will remain largely a curiosity for the next few years, with an unstable and rapidly-evolving vendor marketplace. However they suggest that enterprises with hands-busy mobile applications should investigate and prototype the technology and deploy tactically if appropriate. In this year's technology trends report released by the Gartner Group, wearables were predicted to enter the mainstream by the year 2006. ( Gartner Group, Strategic Analysis Report, 1999)

To: Wolff who wrote (3724)	3/28/2000 1:18:00 PM
From: Scott C. Lemon	Respond to of 6847

Hello Wolff, > Scott: RE URLs: Again if we are in the Men's Room at the > same time I am not going to hold it for you. OK! Is that > OK? Hmmm ... I know that I'm not the quickest person around ... you'll have to explain this to me if you need me to understand. I'm afraid that I just don't quite understand your meanings ... > Handle the research that you need, talk to me on content. Gladly ... I'm following up on all the reading that I am doing, and I'll be glad to post my analysis on everything that I find. I'll look forward to your comments! > Your URL not being posted is a joke. Show me the absence > of URLs if you must, but you and I know that is the > problem. Again, I apologize ... I'm not sure that I understand your comment. I always try to post all URLs of my research, and I'm actually developing a web site to provide even a larger breadth of information on the areas of the market that I focus on. I'll have a lot of information on wearable computers ... When you say my URLs ... did I not post some? > You want to raise doubt, fine, do what you need to do I'd actually just like to gather as much information as possible on one market that I am invested in. I appreciate your efforts, but also want to include the URLs to reference sources of information ... Thanks again! Scott C. Lemon