SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PAL who wrote (5629)3/27/2000 3:36:00 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8096
 
There are some stock that you want to stay away from selling CC. CSCO is one of them.

I have a lot of respect for your obvious ability, but I just don't agree with the above statement. I've had considerable success writing CC and naked calls on CSCO. Given the large institutional participation buying frenzies frequently cause the stock to get ahead of itself. Last month when a reallocation of the S&P 500 caused an upward blip, I sold Mar 140 for over 4 that expired worthless. I like situations where both the Naz and CSCO are simultaneously over extended, for then it's unlikely CSCO will "run" on me. In this chart provided by LG, you can see the upper channel that defines what I mean by overextended.

marketdirectionanalysis.homestead.com

Just another perspective.

lurking...

lurqer



To: PAL who wrote (5629)3/27/2000 7:11:00 PM
From: Jimbo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8096
 
re: There are some stock that you want to stay away from selling CC. CSCO is one of them.

Boy I second that emotion ! It is by far my biggest holding and ever darn time I try to sell the ccs on it I have gotten burned - Sold the Apr 165s when the common was at 140. Thought I would be safe no way here we are at 80 already - agreed CSCO is acting differently after splitting - don't know why - maybe qtr end window dressing !