SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100262)3/27/2000 3:25:00 PM
From: Rob Young  Respond to of 1577183
 
This is an easy one...

The TWO biggest problems for Merced will be:

Performance AND
Price/Performance

The former because 1.4 GHz Willamette will be there when
700 MHz Itanium goes production (not to mention 1.2 GHz
Athlon, on-chip L2). Secondly, and nearly as important is
Price/Performance.. Itanium should cost as much or more
than Xeon with 2MB cache, priced those lately? More than
$2K each. If a 4 processor Willamette/Athlon server is
very near Itanium in performance, it would be -silly- to
go for Itanium as the Willamette box will run IA32 far
faster. The 1 year slippage is a big issue for Itanium.
Linley Gwennap projects 4 processor Itaniums to do 45K
, 4 processor Intel boxes do 27K today, wouldn't be that
hard to believe a near doubling of clock speed and
improved chipsets will double that number by year-end.

Yep, Itanium ... all dressed up and no place to go.

Rob



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100262)3/28/2000 12:13:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577183
 
McMannis - Re: "What do you see as the biggest problem with Merced...?"

Software.

Merced will need a rock-solid Operating system - or 2 or 3 - and these take a long time to test, debug, re-test, release and make in-system evaluation and correction.

Next, applications software is critical to provide a necessary "reason" for customers to specify, purchase, install and support a Merced/ITanium system.

These are on-going now, and have been on-going in hardware since FIRST SILICON last fall - and for over a year prior to that using Intel's IA64 software simulators.

By the way - in light of this, when the SLudgeHumper is released in 1 1/2 years, it will probably be 3 years behind Merced/IA 64 in overall 64-bit PRODUCT development.

Paul