SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (101691)3/28/2000 4:52:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"Energy inflation is here. We'll have to learn to live with it"

Now where are those guys who were laughing last fall when someone yelled inflation...?
Harry, Tony, John F? <G>

Jim



To: GVTucker who wrote (101691)3/28/2000 5:23:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Note that there is disagreement among the OPEC countries about what the quotas should be. That is primarily because most of OPEC is already producing at capacity.

I guess we'll just have to see. I personally have a hard time believing that the OPECers would not maintain their oil fields just because they're not pumping at that exact time. Miners put their mines in maintenance mode when they curtail operations. Are you saying that can't be done with oil fields?

Reports say that the OPECers have decided to increase production by 1.7 million barrels per day without the approval of Iran. If so, this will increase the friction by breaking up the consensus and will encourage cheating. Of course, if you're right and the OPECers just turned off their pumps and didn't maintain them then they can't pump any more oil anyway.



To: GVTucker who wrote (101691)3/28/2000 5:24:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV, I went over to Yahoo to see if there was any news on Intel and they were talking about a bearish call by Ashok Kumar. The article below doesn't look bearish at all, slight exceptions being:

"Due to weak commercial demand, we expect units to be down modestly sequentially, but up over 20 percent year-over-year," and this:

"From a trading perspective we need to be cognizant of seasonal weakness in second quarter 2000 and that earnings upside should primarily from gross margin expansion and not an acceleration of top line growth."

Of course even these aren't bearish, but more seasonal facts of life in this business.

The rest is great, including predictions of 64% GMs this quarter, 66% exiting the year, and $0.75 EPS this quarter. I just wonder if the remarks about commercial demand in Q1 and Q2 being seasonally weak were singled out today.

www2.marketwatch.com

U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Delivers Quarterly Earnings Preview on INTC; Kumar Sites Primary Positive Trend: Cost Declines Ahead of ASP Erosion

TUESDAY, MARCH 28 2000 10:48 AM EST

MENLO PARK, Calif., Mar 28, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- US. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Managing Director and Senior Computer Hardware and Semiconductor Analyst Ashok Kumar today provided an earnings preview for Strong Buy rated Intel Corporation (INTC--$139 1/16, #). Intel is the world's largest chip-maker and is also a leading manufacturer of computer, networking and communications products.

"Due to weak commercial demand, we expect units to be down modestly sequentially, but up over 20 percent year-over-year," said Kumar. "In our view, the positive surprise is on gross margins, which are expected to expand about 270 basis points sequentially to about 64 percent. Contrary to consensus opinion, we expect average-selling prices (ASPs) to continue to decline, but an improved cost structure should enable the company to exit the year at 66 percent gross margins."

"Reflective of this, we increased our 2000 earnings-per-share estimate to $3.15 from $2.70," said Kumar. "Our current first quarter earnings-per-share estimate of $0.75 is $0.07 above consensus."

"We continue to maintain that Intel is a core technology holding," said Kumar. "From a trading perspective we need to be cognizant of seasonal weakness in second quarter 2000 and that earnings upside should primarily from gross margin expansion and not an acceleration of top line growth," said Kumar.

For more information, visit our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com

. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, a subsidiary of Minneapolis-based U.S. Bancorp, provides a full range of investment products and services to businesses, institutions and individuals. The company's investment banking business has grown exponentially in the last several years by focusing on the needs of growth companies in the health care, technology, financial institutions, consumer and industrial growth sectors. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray has a national reputation for its expertise in fundamental research and equity and debt financing. U.S. Bancorp offers a comprehensive range of financial solutions through U.S. Bank, First American Asset Management, U.S. Bancorp Libra Investments and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray. Securities products and services offered through U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc., member SIPC and NYSE, Inc., a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp.

Some or all of the following hedges may apply. (#) U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc., makes a market in the company's securities. (~) A U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc., officer, director or other employee is a director and/or officer of the company. (@) Within the past three years, U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc., was managing underwriter of an offering of, or dealer manager of a tender offer for, the company's securities of an affiliate. Additional information is available upon request. Not FDIC Insured. No Bank Guarantee. May lose value.

This material is based on data obtained from sources we deem to be reliable; it is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete. This information is not intended to be used as the primary basis of investment decisions. Because of individual client requirements, it should not be construed as advice designed to meet the particular investment needs of any investor. It is not a representation by us or an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or buy any security. Further, a security described in this release may not be eligible for solicitation in the states in which the client resides. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray individual officers, employees, or members of their families may own securities mentioned and may purchase or sell those securities in the open market or otherwise. In the United Kingdom, this report may only be distributed or passed on to persons of the kind described in Article 11 (3) of the Financial Services Act of 1986 (Investment Advertisements) (Exemptions) Order 1996 (as amended by the Financial Services Act 1986 Investment Advertisements) (Exemptions Order 1997).

Copyright (C) 2000 Business Wire. All rights reserved.

Distributed via COMTEX.
-0-
CONTACT: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Menlo Park
Erin Freeman
Media Relations Consultant
650/233-2200
or
Mike MacMillan
MacMillan Communications
212/473-4442

WEB PAGE: businesswire.com

GEOGRAPHY: CALIFORNIA MINNESOTA

INDUSTRY CODE: INVESTMENT
OPINION

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.




Intraday data provided by S&P Comstock and subject to terms of use.










To: GVTucker who wrote (101691)3/29/2000 1:06:00 AM
From: nihil  Respond to of 186894
 
Ever since Reagan trashed the alternative energy programs and decontrolled oil and gas prices, we have been subject to the oil monopoly whenever they could get their stuff together.
We are sitting on the edge of serious alternative energy development. Liquifying natural gas, bioenergy, fuel cells, hydrogen, synthetics, everything is available in a few years.
All that is necessary is for the federal government to guarantee a real price target (by buying future energy contracts) on a multiyear future market. Any entrepreneur who wants to drill for oil or gas reserves or build a synthoil or shale plant, or solar cell factory can sell forward energy (lock in a price), and the utilities and oil retailers and government can buy future energy as they wish. This market would provide intermodal exchange rates. If the future price increases (as it would have this past year) suppliers will be stimulated into producing more energy. If excess selling forces the future price down, so be it.