SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bear Down who wrote (5252)3/29/2000 10:04:00 AM
From: Mighty_Mezz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7056
 
I suppose, if it came down to it, they could get around Rule 701 by saying they paid Merger in cash, and Merger turned around and bought 35,000 shares with it.

The disclaimer says:Merger Communications, its officers, directors, and employees own 35,000 restricted shares of company common stock.
It doesn't say how they got the shares. :-)

...Mezz -



To: Bear Down who wrote (5252)3/29/2000 1:37:00 PM
From: wonk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7056
 
BD,

I believe the changes in Rule 701 have to be read in conjunction with the S-8 Rule changes.

The S-8 Rules:

...Form S-8 also has been misused to register securities issued to compensate ?consultants? and ?advisors? for promoting the issuer?s securities.[12] This practice facilitates securities fraud by providing compensation as incentive to persons who hype the issuer?s stock, and may result in these persons conditioning the market for resales of the issuer?s securities.

Today we are adopting some of the amendments that we proposed in February 1998 which are designed to prevent these abuses.[13] The amendments will:

* clarify that Form S-8 is not available for consultants and advisors who directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the issuer?s securities; and

* provide that certain registration statements and post- effective amendments that automatically become effective upon filing will not be presumed filed on the proper form if the Commission does not object to the form before the effective date....


sec.gov

As for Rule 701:

...As revised, securities promoters clearly will be excluded from the scope of persons eligible to participate under the exemption. Independent agents,37 franchisees and salespersons who do not have an employment relationship with the issuer no longer will be within the scope of "consultant or advisor."38 A person in a de facto employment relationship with the issuer, such as a non-employee providing services that traditionally are performed by an employee,39 with compensation paid for those services being the primary source of the person's earned income, would qualify as an eligible person under the exemption.40 Other persons displaying significant characteristics of "employment," such as the professional advisor providing bookkeeping services, computer programming advice, or other valuable professional services may qualify as eligible consultants or advisors, depending upon the particular facts and circumstances.41 Our staff will continue to handle questions about "consultant or advisor" status on a case-by-case basis through its interpretive letter process, but the terms will be interpreted in the same manner for both Rule 701 and Form S-8. ...

sec.gov

The way I read it, companies can still pay promoters in shares, however the shares will not be registered or fall under the exemptions to registration for officers and employees. Not sure though.

ww