To: ahhaha who wrote (20439 ) 3/30/2000 5:34:00 PM From: FR1 Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29970
Did you catch the Yahoo link to the Forbes article today?: url: biz.yahoo.com As far as I can tell, Forbes is implying that the AOL/TWX deal will make it so they (with roadrunner) can offer more to Cox/Comcast than ATHM can (I assume implying Cox and Comcast will switch to roadrunner). T, with a big investment in ATHM, had to scramble to save its investment and hence this deal. The article colors T as shaking in fear of AOL/TWX. The article almost leaves you with the feeling that Cox and Comcast will cash in their ATHM shares for a big profit in January and move to AOL/TWX. Anyhow, this might have added a little worry to buyers today. I am sure everyone is thinking this deal over. I don't like the way Forbes writes. Once they decide to paint black it gets into the writing. For example: Armstrong today offered to buy out the stakes of two minority partners in @Home, namely cable providers Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSK - news) and Cox Communications (NYSE: COX - news), for at least $48 a share. That's a 27% premium over the closing price of Excite@Home, on top of the nearly 10% boost the stock got from today's news. The paragraph accidentally fails to mention that this is not until next year and they are not buying them out but simply offer a put to guarantee performance. In the next paragraph they try to clear it up a little but wind up making you feel that Cox and Comcast can leave at any time starting now:AT&T's buyout offer won't kick in until Jan. 1, 2001, at the earliest, which means Armstrong has guaranteed Cox and Comcast a healthy return on their investments if they remain part of the @Home venture for at least nine more months. Then they get heavy with the black paint:.....Armstrong is scrambling to respond to America Online's (NYSE: AOL - news) pending acquisition of cable and media giant Time Warner (NYSE: TWX - news), which has transformed the competitive landscape for broadband Internet service. That takeover will give AOL a way to deliver a wealth of content to its 20 million Internet subscribers at high speeds over Time Warner's cable system. ``They (AT&T) have their hands full,' says telecommunications analyst Jeffrey Kagan. ``Gone are the days when they only had to compete with MCI or Sprint,' he says, adding that the AOL-Time Warner combination poses the biggest threat to Armstrong's plans for broadband domination.....