SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (20439)3/30/2000 3:21:00 PM
From: red_dog  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 29970
 
Excite@Home Shafted
Kevin Prigel
Mar 30 2000
Bad news, Excite@Home shareholders: you?ve been taken to the cleaners. The ?deal? announced yesterday involving Excite@Home, AT&T [T], Comcast [CMCSK], and Cox Communications [COX] benefits all but one party. Sell now, or hang on for more pilfering by the corporate shareholders.

streetadvisor.com



To: ahhaha who wrote (20439)3/30/2000 4:06:00 PM
From: deeno  Respond to of 29970
 
Although I actually agree with the thoughts regarding a working relationship between T and MSFT, doesnt the current regulatory envirnoment (regardless of your views of whether they ar right or not ;^)) make it somewhat difficult for these two companies to form a to close alliance? Or because of the different businesses involved, you dont think eyebrows would raise to much?



To: ahhaha who wrote (20439)3/30/2000 5:34:00 PM
From: FR1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29970
 
Did you catch the Yahoo link to the Forbes article today?:

url: biz.yahoo.com

As far as I can tell, Forbes is implying that the AOL/TWX deal will make it so they (with roadrunner) can offer more to Cox/Comcast than ATHM can (I assume implying Cox and Comcast will switch to roadrunner). T, with a big investment in ATHM, had to scramble to save its investment and hence this deal. The article colors T as shaking in fear of AOL/TWX. The article almost leaves you with the feeling that Cox and Comcast will cash in their ATHM shares for a big profit in January and move to AOL/TWX.

Anyhow, this might have added a little worry to buyers today. I am sure everyone is thinking this deal over.

I don't like the way Forbes writes. Once they decide to paint black it gets into the writing. For example:

Armstrong today offered to buy out the stakes of two minority partners in @Home, namely cable providers Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSK - news) and Cox Communications (NYSE: COX - news), for at least $48 a share. That's a 27% premium over the closing price of Excite@Home, on top of the nearly 10% boost the stock got from today's news.

The paragraph accidentally fails to mention that this is not until next year and they are not buying them out but simply offer a put to guarantee performance.

In the next paragraph they try to clear it up a little but wind up making you feel that Cox and Comcast can leave at any time starting now:

AT&T's buyout offer won't kick in until Jan. 1, 2001, at the earliest, which means Armstrong has guaranteed Cox and Comcast a healthy return on their investments if they remain part of the @Home venture for at least nine more months.

Then they get heavy with the black paint:

.....Armstrong is scrambling to respond to America Online's (NYSE: AOL - news) pending acquisition of cable and media giant Time Warner (NYSE: TWX - news), which has transformed the competitive landscape for broadband Internet service. That takeover will give AOL a way to deliver a wealth of content to its 20 million Internet subscribers at high speeds over Time Warner's cable system.

``They (AT&T) have their hands full,' says telecommunications analyst Jeffrey Kagan. ``Gone are the days when they only had to compete with MCI or Sprint,' he says, adding that the AOL-Time Warner combination poses the biggest threat to Armstrong's plans for broadband domination.....