SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RJ2 who wrote (931)3/31/2000 1:32:00 PM
From: RICK  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2255
 
Taken from the Flag thread.

To: Just G who wrote (2897)
From: RJ2 Friday, Mar 31, 2000 1:03 PM ET
Reply # of 2898

I feel some of the investors on the runup on the PFN have been deceived, the results from thier RV-02 hole that states there is 3.6 metres of 6.78 grams per ton of PGM has been described out of context. Does this assay contain gold as the filler to obtain the the designated number, who knows, but it would be nice if they didn't ball up the yellow metal with the rare earth, white stuff!! The write up in the National Post was nothing more than a quick splash job that needs to be refined before the true numbers are known, my thoughts only!! I got this feeling about this deception after reading Ptaskmaster saying in message 878 on the PFN chat group, " who cares about the gold content, I'd like to know the Rhodium content" it kind of got the old brain cells motoring and I think the this question deserves a proper anwser!!! What do you people think??



RJ2,
I see you posted the same question on all the other PFN and Flag threads. You won't get a response from Just G, on a well deserved vacation. First of all I think that you are a ruthless low life and to even mention the words "DECEPTION" and "Deceived" in regards to this play is totally out of line. Have you not seen what the Bre-x scandal has done to the Canadian mining industry. If you have a question please post it, but keep your thoughts to yourself until you can verify them. You really don't know what the impact of these threads have on a play do you. You sir owe this play an apology for even posting such a thing and then you can go back to the other threads that you have posted the same garbage on and withdraw your posts. With out any fact to back you up, what you have posted is very serious.

Rick



To: RJ2 who wrote (931)3/31/2000 4:26:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2255
 
<<You just can't ball all the metals up into one number and let it ride!! >>

True. But the company did mentioned that the gold was very low relative to PGE's... Still, am very surprised they didn't split the results.

The grades looks OK. IMVHO. The problem might be to get enough tonnage to justify the current stock price.

Good Luck to all.