Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Young who wrote (40304)	4/2/2000 1:47:00 AM
From: anandnvi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Hi, Please forgive my ignorance of the American political system ( I was born and raised in India ), but how would a new administration change things? Thanks Anand

To: Michael Young who wrote (40304)	4/2/2000 1:53:00 AM
From: John Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Michael Young,re:"Keep in mind ...1999">. Oh my god. See you 2009. <ggg> It's not funny, and this is a very serious case, the 'dream teams' on both side have a very long and tough job ahead. Monopoly is not at issue here, I read somewhere saying : "Did MSFT legally defend the monopoly?". As long as it is legal, monopoly is allowed/protected by law. I believe there is saying floating around: "we may be xxxxxxxx each other but that doesn't stop us becoming friends". define 'legal monopoly', please. IT COSTS TOO MUCH TO DEFINE/UNDEFINE, ALLOW/DISALLOW. The truth of the matter is: local phone company costs more than the Babybells for same service (ie: consumer don't see the benefit). Some enterprenaur will benefit due to the opening. This will be the same here. MSFT has the economic of scale. Don't expect you get 'cheaper price for same product'.