SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (3259)4/4/2000 9:38:00 AM
From: DWB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
JDN,

Just curious, could it be that somewhere in the generation of the information you read, that someone used the term 6m for the effective distance, which got misinterpreted as 6 miles in your information, but was meant as 6 meters by the originator?

DWB
Q2.5K/Y2K+5



To: JDN who wrote (3259)4/4/2000 9:47:00 AM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 5853
 
it solves the last mile problem
I think 6 mile wireless would be an important part of the last mile problem, but I don't think it is the solution. There is only so much wireless bandwidth to go around and if 40% or so of the houses were connected there would be a lot of "all circuits busy" type of errors. Still when cable, and DSL are not available wireless is a reasonable option (as is terrabeam's laser point to point connections). Ultimately fiber will probably run right up to the curb of most urban buildings, but there will be a lot of interim solutions before that is finished.
TP



To: JDN who wrote (3259)4/4/2000 9:57:00 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
Hi,

The 'larger' problem is size and power consumption. 'BlueTooth' was intended for AAA batteries and Personal Area Networks. Doubtful anything with a six-mile range works on AAA batteries.

At the current time, BlueTooth V2 is under discussion:
bluetooth.com
bluetoothcongress.com
and doesn't go six miles.

petere