Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (19057)	4/7/2000 11:56:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 27311

Fred, you have been posting nonsense about VLNC for three years. During that time, VLNC has signicantly underperformed the NASDAQ. bigcharts.com (The 3 year comparison against the NASDAQ did not come through. But one can easily verify VLNC's underperformance since Fred started posting his bs.) So, in addition to the fact that you have been posting b.s. for years, you now want to take credit for the underperformance of your stock against the NASDAQ?

To: FMK who wrote (19057)	4/7/2000 12:22:00 PM
From: LiPolymer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

FMK, as you probably know, Larry admitted through his Yahoo ID that he recently shorted Valence, I believe in the high 20's and low 30's, then subsequently covered on D-day this week at $14 if memory serves correctly. (Side note: With all the trouble folks had getting fills when Valence bottomed on Tuesday, it was probably a pretty small order.) For whatever reason, he seems to only want to play Valence on the down side and has geared his outlook on the company accordingly. In fact just yesterday he misrepresented the latest SEC filing by stating Valence has an immediate need for capital: "The SEC filings state they have an immediate need for additional capital." However, if one actually reads the latest SEC filing, this is clearly not the case. Regards, Gary Smith