Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (16856)	4/12/2000 2:26:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

I don't see that you've addressed MY points. Again: More nonsense. Don't you ever get sick a bashing republicans? Comparing Gore's dishonesty to Reagan is a cheap shot, even for you. Of course it is futile to reason with a Reagan hater. On Olasky, it seems odd that you'd get hung up on him just because he's a chauvinist. Clinton, Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, they're all chauvinists, albeit not of the Christian right variety. Heck, Larry Flynt is an evil chauvinist and I've never read any criticism of him from you. You and I both know that Olasky is NOT Bush's "ethics advisor". Why do you persist in repeating this lie?

To: E who wrote (16856)	4/13/2000 1:06:00 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I'm glad you mentioned Condoleeza Rice. She is someone we should be hearing more from. I hope the Bush people give her a bigger role in public speaking. I heard her give a speech on C-Span and she was just tremendous. Have you heard her speak? I think you would be impressed.

To: E who wrote (16856)	4/13/2000 3:55:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 769667

Neocon: Someone PM'd me expressing surprise that I had done something "un-E-like," and called you a "derogatory name." I was mystified to hear this, and just reread all my recent posts, failing on the first reading to see the example of that. But on my second reading, I picked up the "Neocoon" in the post to which I'm linking this. I am mortified, and apologize, and hope you will believe that although I was intentionally a bit mean in my use of "JLALOL," for JLA, "Neocoon" was a typo. (I hope and trust that you will have no trouble accepting that this is the case, if for no other reason than that it makes absolutely no sense as an epithet to use toward you!) When I wrote that message, I was rather a wreck, and spaced out on heavy migraine meds, so it's surprising that there were not more errors, actually. Forgive that, please, Neocon. It was not on purpose.