Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gnuman who wrote (39688)	4/12/2000 3:31:00 PM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Another satisfied customer... In the May issue of Money magazine, on page 31, is a sidebar titled Millionaires in the Making. This month it highlights Steven and Sunni Kang of Victor NY who have assets of $400,000. Within the body it says: "Kang honed his financial skills, in part, by investing his parents' money. In two years, he turned a $75,000 profit. That success spurred him to become master of his own universe. Last May, Kang rolled over his $180,000 401K into an IRA and began trading online. His kitty has since soared a whopping 92% to $345,000, thanks to a few hot picks such as Electronics for Imaging and Rambus" Over 48,000 served <G>. Dave

To: gnuman who wrote (39688)	4/12/2000 3:34:00 PM
From: Ian Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Its old, and the author could hardly be considered an unbiased commentator! I don't believe all that stuff about guard traces either! >Author Bill Gervasi Vice Chairman, JEDEC Memory Timing Committee

To: gnuman who wrote (39688)	4/12/2000 3:36:00 PM
From: jim kelley	Respond to of 93625

Interesting! The article was written in August last year. It seems to be a position paper on the part of JEDEC. It will take a while to check the accuracy of the numbers he is reporting on RDRAM. But they are certainly easy to check against the actual data sheets. According to the article there are no hidden liabilities to DDR-266. But we know differently already. :)

To: gnuman who wrote (39688)	4/12/2000 11:57:00 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi Gene Parrott; What did I say, the longs would complain that it was obviously a biased paper cause the author signed his name? But dramreview.com wasn't biased because Rambus didn't sign their name to it? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA This is getting more and more like AENG or OVIS. Stuart plays the part of Riley asking people to "call in their certs." What I will do this weekend is backtrack the dramreview figures for power consumption. I believe that I know how they computed their lies, and I can show to any (competent) digital engineer where the errors are. They are off by nearly an order of magnitude, it truly is silly. How could they put something like this on a website that was traceable back to them??? The response of the longs will be to try and change the subject. But I will instead go through the issues on that website one at a time, and thoroughly, we will not miss anything. Of course, mom and pop will still be in a "he said, she said" situation regarding the electronics issues, but they at least, will no longer be able to be in a "he said, she said" situation regarding the ethics issues. -- Carl