SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thunder who wrote (41957)4/13/2000 3:30:00 AM
From: blankmind  Respond to of 74651
 
- Givnen amd's robust sales of microprocessors, MSFT had to have a stellar quarter in PC's.

- my money continues to be on msft; & for a great quarter

- In fact, I'll even go out on a limb & say msft probably finsihes north of $85 today (closed at $79 3/8)



To: Thunder who wrote (41957)4/13/2000 11:50:00 AM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Worst case stuff ...

I think the worst outcome for Microsoft would be to have the company's ability to operate profitably impeded. After all, the basic reason for being in business is to make profits, and the basic reason to own shares are to participate in those profits. Remove this underlying fundamental reason to own the shares of this company and massive selling and an accompanying decline in capitalization would follow.

Many believe that a few little MSFTs would be more profitable than one big one. I don't know about this. (Note: I'm not saying one way or the other -- just that I don't know.) Some other remedies, such as a tinker here and there with the features of Microsoft products may have an impact from undetectable to profound: We've no option but wait and see. The severity and success of hyena-nipping lawsuits waiting in the wings is another unknown. Wise investors usually assign considerable weight to unknown risk; hence, the aggressive selling of Microsoft pending further trustworthy information. When additional light shines on this matter, I, and nearly everyone else, will re-evaluate their MSFT strategy. Once we clearly see where we want to go with this stock, we can map a route.

A few people, the permanent bashers and persistent promoters won't change their minds. Since the bears would have us selling even at the bottom and the promoters would have us buying even at the top, they can be profitably ignored for the most part. When confronted with evidence in conflict with my current beliefs, I'll change my mind. As yet, in spite of sifting through stacks of chaff, I haven't found much contradictory wheat.

I'll still divest myself of the trading shares I bought at $100 and $90, probably as they approach $140. This may take a bit longer than planned. If I don't see danger signs, I may yield to the temptation to get a little more -- I'll see.

Cheers, PW.




To: Thunder who wrote (41957)4/13/2000 11:57:00 AM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Little Microsofts ...

Currently, Microsoft has taken the low price, high volume approach to marketing their products. A dollar lost on Windows can be re-captured on Office as long as the consumer remains 'in the family.'

If Microsoft splits, say OS and Applications, consumers would be purchasing their software from two companies both trying to maximize their profits. In this environment, the consumer would expect, and be required, to pay higher prices for every piece needed to fill their needs. We can disregard compatibility issues because they are sure to worsen -- this is a given.

A break-up of Microsoft will harm consumers. This fact is axiomatic.

Cheers, PW.