SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (78107)4/14/2000 4:03:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
X has morals even if they don't line up with yours and or mine. It is not possible not to have a definition of right and wrong. She has lots of statements regarding what is wrong with what I think is right for example.



To: jlallen who wrote (78107)4/14/2000 4:06:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
I am going to edit your statement. People with morals that are not founded on sound principle have problems with "moral judgements." X and Steven, for example, deny the existence of principles.



To: jlallen who wrote (78107)4/14/2000 4:07:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Ooops! Guess that was a little too on the mark, eh?



To: jlallen who wrote (78107)4/15/2000 5:39:00 AM
From: Edwarda  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Persons without morals generally have a problem with "judgments" by others. That's how they justify their own smallness. They imply there is something odd or wrong to reach a "judgment" about the actions of others.

There are times when it wise to forsake the shotgun and use a rifle. This particular shot misses its mark altogether. To question the origins of morality is not to be without moral fiber.