SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (46328)4/14/2000 8:00:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
George, another point of note is that specifically the big cap bubble, which includes stalwarts like GE and WMT, not to mention the big cap tech stocks, remains at a highly inflated level. my opinions on the bubble and its causes and eventual consequences are probably well known by now, but i want to add something pertaining to the role of the technological revolution here. while it is true that on balance technological progress is taking place at an astounding pace, and has brought a great many benefits and will bring even more in the future, the bubble in the credit and asset markets is NOT a natural expression of said benefits. i believe the new era proponents have got this crucial point wrong. the tech revolution only lent the bubble the necessary psychological fuel, the 'idea', the 'concept' around which its inflation centered. but the REASON for the bubble coming into existence is the enormous acceleration in the money supply, as well as the increase in the velocity of money due to the activities of the GSE's and other big credit market players. so the new era proponents will realize with time, as have others before them, that a bubble can deflate while technological progress continues on its merry way.
as i have said before, the stock market at times gets to a point where decades of growth are expressed in share prices in one euphoric moment.
of course the basis of my analysis is mainly history, as well as a sprinkling of common sense. and as somebody has said about 10 years ago, history is dead. there was a book published with the title "the death of history". it was written after the fall of the Berlin wall. at the time i thought, well, the death of mathematics and algebra can't be far behind. looking at today's 'analysts' justifications for stock prices i realize that indeed, history is not the only thing that died.

regards,

hb



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (46328)4/14/2000 11:54:00 PM
From: Fun-da-Mental#1  Respond to of 99985
 
Re recession, crashes destroy wealth, but more than that they reveal how much wealth has already been wasted on frivolous and unproductive ventures during the good times. (That's what the old books I've been reading tell me anyway <g>)

Fun-da-Mental