Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Computer Associates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (4160)	4/16/2000 9:13:00 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5232

he forgot to say it will go to the 40's first....or even the 30's.... then 160... talk about a long term horizon...that's an horizon with a roundtrip feature... J

To: Edwarda who wrote (4160)	4/19/2000 2:30:00 AM
From: Crystal ball	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5232

Neugents. I am, Truly your$, -Crystal Ball

To: Edwarda who wrote (4160)	4/21/2000 9:06:00 PM
From: Danny Boy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5232

May I humbly offer my opinion on CA's correct valuation? The current market multiple for the group is 57. CA is 14. CA is one of the top 3 software firms in the world with 6.3B in revenue. '98 growth was 11% (Asia crisis) '99 growth was 20% (Y2K). No telling the effect of Y2K until this year is out. That equals uncertainty which equals sell the stock. Fine. The stock is trading below its 1997 high. Find another major software leader including MSFT who is trading below their '97 high. CA has accelerating growth. But this requires confirmation in coming quarters. If you believe the growth in revenue is a trend then you must consider the market multiple which gives you a price of 57x 3.20 or 182 well ahead of Crystal's 160. The 57 would be a premium to growth but is that so unusual? A nominal PE of 35 would give you a price of 112 and against next years 3.86 (which I consider light) 135. If the stock were to climb to such lofty levels in the metric of some on this thread then rumors of a split would be in order creating further speculation. Crystal's 160 seems quite reasonable and even a little shy of potential 12 month targets. But it is a nice round figure that comes in between high hopes and normal expectations. Isn't that what Wall Street is supposed to do? My advice to the bears is to short like hell on the way down or up and look for those 20 to 30 percent returns. I'm only looking for a 4 bagger. Come and get your love, DGB