Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug M. who wrote (40215)	4/18/2000 9:15:00 AM
From: Pat Hughes	Respond to of 93625

Love that post! Especially the Toms Hardware dig. Love that one!

To: Doug M. who wrote (40215)	4/18/2000 1:20:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Doug, <Intel reiterated that their only need for DDR was in the Server market and that they have no intention to go beyond DDR 200.> I agree with the first part of your statement, but not the second. That's all. Tenchusatsu

To: Doug M. who wrote (40215)	4/18/2000 4:48:00 PM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Doug McLeod's post from Taiwan ("Thread, I'm currently at the Intel Developer's Forum in Taipei, Taiwan. It started this AM (Taipei Time) and the first day is just about over right now (currently 4:45PM in Taiwan).") is currently one of the SI Cool Posts.

To: Doug M. who wrote (40215)	4/18/2000 5:24:00 PM
From: Estephen	Respond to of 93625

He put a lot of emphasis on how much work still needs to be done to get the DDR platform up to spec. I almost felt as if he was telling the audience that too much work needs to be done and that it may not be worth the effort. Makes sense.... Why bother with a non-standard mutant that ultimately is a dead end.