SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (102591)4/18/2000 10:24:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jozef,

Since Intel didn't lose market share, by not having additional capacity, Intel couldn't lower prices to compete any more aggressively than they did, so to that extent, you're right that they opened the door for AMD. When Intel has the additional capacity later this year, I don't anticipate that AMD will be allowed to gain any market share - in fact, the opposite may occur.

We shall see.

Barry



To: Joe NYC who wrote (102591)4/18/2000 11:01:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 186894
 
It was me. I said one more quarter for AMD to dance and then slam the door (on AMD). I understand AMD has significant quantities of Athlons in inventory, and that's when Intel is sold out. What happens when Intel can meet all demand (if they can), and they are the CPU chip vendor of choice, which they still are? It's either lower price or raise more inventory for AMD, my eco 101 says.

Tony



To: Joe NYC who wrote (102591)4/19/2000 2:03:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
Joe, <But my reading of the report is that Intel opened the door for AMD wider than ever before (as opposed to slamming it as some clueless Intel fan here believes - I forgot who it was). Wouldn't you agree?>

Oh yes, I definitely agree. Intel just said that Q2 will also be supply-constrained, which means the good times for AMD will continue.

Tenchusatsu