Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stephen who wrote (47796)	4/23/2000 6:12:00 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99985

like it says in the song....... Denn ein Haifisch ist kein Haifisch Wenn man nicht beweisen kann

To: Stephen who wrote (47796)	4/23/2000 6:48:00 PM
From: MDGO	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99985

Your post of the "Sunday Times article from the UK" should be required reading for every investor in order be made aware of the conflict of interest and collusion on Wall St. Please post the URL for this article.

To: Stephen who wrote (47796)	4/24/2000 12:39:00 AM
From: Michael Watkins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Stephen, Once upon a time some months ago I recall having a discussion with someone on this thread about the hyping by promoters to the "bag holders". Typically anything negative said about the market or critical of the professional's role in this market attracts a bunch of market defenders. My position then, and now, is that the market exists primarily as a massive wealth transference system, with the investment banking community and insiders having the lowest risk/highest reward deal around, and the public largely caught 'holding the bag'. The defenders are getting more and more quiet... Its nice to start to see the mainstream press starting, finally, to write about the shams and collusion present in the system. For some time I've been expecting the "What Were We Thinking" specials to start airing... getting closer to that point now, I think.

To: Stephen who wrote (47796)	4/24/2000 3:07:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

>>"She received threats and Goldman Sachs has had to hire her a bodyguard," says a banker. Goldman Sachs would neither confirm nor deny this. << It would make more sense if she received the threats several years ago when she first started spinning the facts to justify ever higher prices. That's when the pillage began, not when the market started falling. Responsible and level headed people should have discredited her extremely biased interpretations before she helped hype America into this situation.