SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John F. Dowd who wrote (43039)4/23/2000 10:38:00 PM
From: techtonicbull  Respond to of 74651
 
You must support the relatives of Elian Gonzalez over the father. The law is the law. It will be enforced against MSFT since they broke the SHerman Anti Trust Act and Judge Jackson made conclusions of law which is highly unlikely to be overturned. MSFT's rights cannot step on the rights of others.



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (43039)4/23/2000 11:11:00 PM
From: techtonicbull  Respond to of 74651
 
John Dowd: Even Microsoft's insurance company questions coverage. See link below:

msnbc.com

Your bullishness better be for the long term (3 to 5 years out) because MSFT is going to be in for some pressure IMO.



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (43039)4/23/2000 11:23:00 PM
From: techtonicbull  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 74651
 
You and other MSFT die-hards still don't believe that the company harmed other companies. You think their behavior in the corporate world was normal behavior and that no other company or individual has been harmed. Well Judge Jackson's conclusions of law are serious and the May 24th punishments will be serious as well as "bulletproof". It is very unlikely that the judge will be overturned by a higher court of law. Judge Jackson has made particular painstaking efforts to structure his conclusions in a way that will stand. He will do the same thing for his punishment decree.

I hope you are well aware of the beating MSFT can take in addition to the already large losses.



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (43039)4/24/2000 11:17:00 AM
From: SunSpot  Respond to of 74651
 
John, as long as you cannot mention just one little example of what could get confiscated, I have no idea what you are talking about. There is a very high attention to avoid violating any copyrights, trademarks and patents, and as long as these are not violated, I have big difficulties in seeing which intellectual properties you are talking about.

Please be more specific.