SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HairBall who wrote (47852)4/24/2000 11:06:00 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99985
 
I make this as the worst gap-down for the NASDAQ. The data I keep for such checks only goes back to 1984, but todays gap down of -4.86% beat out 87-Oct-26 of -4.78%, a day that went on to a close-to-close down of -9%.

Recent big gap down was 00-Apr-05, but in that case the open was the low of the day.

She's a bouncin' hard now, but I think the fix was in when it did not make a better effort to fill the gap.

How would you folks classify this gap if it endures? Breakaway? Can't really be exhaustion can it, since it is not at a new bottom?

--Allan



To: HairBall who wrote (47852)4/24/2000 11:25:00 AM
From: Cynic 2005  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
LG, I should have known that you would react that way. I know you think you OWN this thread, if not the whole SI. In any case, I personally think what I said is of some substance. I could really care less if you don't agree with my OPINION.

If too many people keep taking about limits and lock limits, I think the end result will be that there is no chance of reaching those limits. It is a contrarian view. That is what I said. Some even call it some form of TA. Only thing is that it will not have DMAs, fibbo, and other voodoo numbers attached to it. Still, it is a read on the MARKET DIRECTION. It just happened that it disagreed with what you said, SFW?

I am cynical alright, but you appear to be downright defensive and very protective about things that don't matter.

To give credit where it is due, I do think that your market observations are good. But you HAVE to change your paranoid psychology. Don't assume that everybody who posts with a view different from yours wants to sabotage your thread, which claim to be a "swimming pool."

Also, don't automatically assume that people react to what you have to say on the markets. At least in my case it is something I pay attention to but never a deciding factor.

-Mohan