Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: that_crazy_doug who wrote (107588)	4/24/2000 3:11:00 PM
From: Kenith Lee	Respond to of 1574093

You left Paul out in your list.

To: that_crazy_doug who wrote (107588)	4/24/2000 3:44:00 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574093

I like Elmer, Amy J, Tench, and PB (back when he did post here) mainly because if they weren't here it'd be 30 of us patting ourselves on the back. (many others here are fairly balanced, but it's nice to see the contrary perspective imo). doug, In theory I think what you say is true but in fact, it doesn't seem to work that way. I find that many of the Intel posts suffer from a serious bias of which the poster is not even aware. And then you get comments from someone like Ten who says that there is no way that AMD is shipping more hi-speed parts than Intel even though the news media, the oem's and Morgan Stanley say otherwise....and makes that statement without any proof. Where is the balance? Where is the objectivity? This type of objectivity I can live without. Frankly the posters on this thread are so not into denial that I think we get all the necessary objectivity and balance we need. Frankly I think what people on this thread would miss the most if there were no Intel longs is the daily sparring....it breaks up the monotony of a lot of new highs....don't you think? :~)) ted