SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Mitchell R. White who wrote (34972)4/25/2000 12:12:00 PM
From: Gottfried  Respond to of 70976
 
Mitch, OT *** OT
Yes, 'near' Lockheed. We're on the other [west] side of town. Today's paper had an ad for an on-line realty which does charge a flat fee for being the seller's agent. I think
that movement will gain, just like on-line discount brokers.

Gottfried



To: Dr. Mitchell R. White who wrote (34972)4/25/2000 12:20:00 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
OT Continued:

6% is only what the clueless pay. When you have property that sells itself, realtors bid for your services. I bought my Los Altos, CA home in the slump (1994) when homes were hard to sell and the sellers went with 5% (3% for buyer's agent and 2% for selling agent). I've seen flat $10K rates as well as other commission deals.

Of course, the real estate community does not want you to know you don't have to pay the fixed rates. When I sold my townhouse, my selling agent would often tell me this or that was fixed and I would negotiate to lower it (even contract terms they will tell you are fixed and you can refuse to lock up one agent for 3 months or whatever). I've known engineers with real estate licenses that will handle deals for 1% selling commission and they use MLS to bring in the buyers. Makes a nice little addition to income selling coworkers' homes.

I am interested to see when the home prices don't go above ask as it means the stock options are cooling off. Then again, one friend has a client that had a > $100M "Liquidity Event" and used a portion of the proceeds to buy a $25M home on 17 mile Drive - Pebble Beach - (in the Monterey CA area). I was told the client had net worth drop 75% in correction but still had one of those "B" s in total stock value. These people can afford to buy any time.

RE: Texas Boom. Sounds like you need a "Proposition 13" that locks in property taxes to purchase price. Property taxes in CA can only go up 2% a year and will actually go down if inflation is negative! Sell your home and buy the one next door and your taxes can double... Ouch!

Kirk out