Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R who wrote (43555)	4/26/2000 4:32:00 PM
From: SunSpot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

I have never seen AOL being used - there must be lots and lots of alternatives in the US, or am I wrong?

To: David R who wrote (43555)	4/26/2000 4:49:00 PM
From: ToySoldier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

I am not going to repeat the 20+ of the 26 charges that MSFT was found guilty on. The "Finding of Facts" clearly documented by the Judge a few weeks ago describes EXACTLY which laws they broke. Why in your right mind would you want me to repeat them. Go on the Internet and download or read them. I am sure they are all on CNN, ZDNet, or a thousand other places. And there you go with your lame examples. You can bring up all the other companies and examples that you want, but you still dont get it - do you. SUN, AOL, or any other company WAS NOT ON TRIAL!! How simple can this be yet you all dont seem to understand this. MSFT was and IS deemed a monopoly - not Sun or AOL. Does that not mean anything to you? Dont bring up these companies since they are not in the same status/class as MSFT. Your examples are completely USELESS! Toy