SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (19433)4/29/2000 1:19:00 PM
From: FMK  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Zeev, re your statement <<Maybe, these facts (or at least, perceived facts) have something to do with the current weakness. One think should be clear to anyone owning this stock, if visibility of reaching some modicum of positive cash flow within a "rational" time horizon does not appear soon, the dreaded single digits could surely reappear.>>

I would re-state this as follows:
Maybe, these facts (or at least, perceived facts) have something to do with the current failure of the shorts to suppress the price to single digits (as you "predicted" or mentioned as a "possibility" that may have worried certain shareholders). One thing should be clear to anyone owning this stock, when positive news is announced, there will be a scramble for available stock as the shorts have over 4 million shares they have "borrowed" and must eventually pay back. With some positive news the stock price could quickly move to the $20's and those who are short might rush to cover before a return to the $30's.

Remember that Oppenheimer, a well-known and reputable firm, has reiterated their $50 price target, and their analysts, unlike yourself and many bashers who post several times a day, have toured Valence facilities and have met with Valence senior management.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (19433)4/29/2000 1:48:00 PM
From: MGV  Respond to of 27311
 
"One think should be clear to anyone owning this stock, if visibility of reaching some modicum of positive cash flow within a "rational" time horizon does not appear soon, the dreaded single digits could surely reappear."

On this we agree yet I bet most here (the many dogmatic) would not so agree.