Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (17838)	4/30/2000 3:28:00 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Bruce, I'm not questioning who should have custody, just trying to say who did at the time certain events took place. If the whole Miami Cuban community is as prone to control, and possible violence, I don't think much of them as wards of a young child. It has been pointed out in news reports that legal custody did belong to the uncle at that time of these events. Right or wrong, that was the law. The only point I am trying to make in this whole issue, is the disregard for the law by the DOJ, Janet Reno, and the rest of the Clinton/Gore administration. I don't care if the subject of the raid had been an orangutan from Borneo, Reno broke the law she is supposed to uphold. The disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America is the only issue about this case that I am objecting to. ~H~