SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (108757)5/1/2000 1:22:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572161
 
Jozef re << But I don't see how they can be prosecuted not obeying monopoly rules before the time of the ruling.>>

Microsoft was declared a Monopoly long ago. I repeat what I just said in the previous post,

How could have Microsoft not known it is a Monopoly? They can write million line of code but they can't figure out what is obvious to every computer user? Please!

Beside, DOJ and Janet Reno investigated Microsoft years ago and to my dismay just gave them a warning. They investigated them for anti competitive monopolistic behavior. They said, don't do it again because "we are watching you!". I remember these exact words from Janet Reno's mouth in a conference call years ago. MSFT went on about its business and disregarded the warning. I am glad this time DOJ had the balls to hold this law which is very necessary.

Mani



To: Joe NYC who wrote (108757)5/1/2000 2:53:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572161
 
Jozef, any company with >80% market share in a market is a monopoly. Besides that, back in the Windows 3.1 days, M$ signed a consent decree saying that their application software group had to be insulated from their OS group, so they would not have an unfair advantage.

I seem to remember lawsuits from outfits like Ashton Tate (DBase database) claiming that M$ used calls to undocumented Windows features in their application software.

Petz