Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dinesh who wrote (24031)	5/2/2000 12:01:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

MSFT OS and the Apps would be two new monopolies in their own right I worked several years as a contractor (now I'm an employee) in the software business. Several startup ideas which I thought were quite good were ultimately abandoned because the windows interfaces could not be worked out adequetely. (one was a graphics design program for textiles, another a scheduling application for parts delivery). The concepts were good. The interface information was nearly nonexistant. It's not just Office or similar programs that are sandbagged by Microsofts hidden API. If consumers don't think they have been hurt it is only because they don't know what they weren't offered. Another word processor? BAH! There are a hundred other programs that people don't have that they didn't even know they wanted. If a breakup exposes the API it will be the greatest productivity gain in a decade. TP

To: Dinesh who wrote (24031)	5/2/2000 1:47:00 AM
From: Mike Buckley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

If govt. pushes for open source, I am going to found an icecream company. ANd my mission will be to make a flavor that best tastes with Coke. I think I might need access to the Coke formula, for full inter-operability. Consumer benefit. All that's left is a lawyer with some free time ... ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!! And if you think Microsoft is the only company in hot water, check the ultimate monopoly out: theonion.com --Mike Buckley

To: Dinesh who wrote (24031)	5/2/2000 9:24:00 AM
From: mauser96	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 54805

I try to avoid the term "monopoly" when discussing MSFT. If memory serves correctly, the term isn't used in The Gorilla Game (at least it's not in the index). Since there have always been alternatives to MSFT products, it's certainly not a monopoly compared to the government, your local cable company, local newspapers, the gas company, etc. The Gorilla Game teaches that as the mass market accepts an many technologies, there's a strong tendency to concentrate power. The applicable laws were written long before the book. In the case of MSFT, a key point is whether it acted like a monopoly, and it's probably guilty of this. Certainly the words "lack of restraint" and "hubris" come to mind. The book "high St@kes No Prisoners" by Charles H. Ferguson has an entire chapter on MSFT. This is the best discussion of the pros and cons I have ever read. The author is a very smart (if unlikeable) guy who has had personal experience in the software business and has dealt with MSFT. Anyone interested in an investment in MSFT should consider this a must read. To quote, concerning a split up "The resulting companies would still be the largest, most profitable software companies in the world, well able to compete and innovate" Personally I would put stress on the possibility of innovation, which is far less likely with a company structured like the present MSFT. MSFT is too big for maximum efficiency - larger companies get some synergy, but past a certain point this is overcome by the drag of extra layers of management. MSFT is Bill Gates baby, and he resists the Solomonic decision (pun intended) to split it asunder. I suspect he is acting more like a proud daddy here than a rational manager. The bad news is out. I have a very small position in MSFT now, and am seriously considering starting to buy more. As others on the thread have mentioned, real gorillas are so rare that most of us wind up buying kings and lesser creatures also. With a split MSFT we get at a minimum a king and gorilla, maybe 2 gorillas. Even opening up the API might be good for the new OS company since it will increase the value chain. The legal case so far has turned out as I expected. I also believe MSFT will lose the appeal process, though undoubtedly MSFT's outside lawyers will be willing to fight the case to MSFT last dollar. Prolonged litigation has a very enervating effect on a company, so buyers may have to be very patient.In any case the government will not present this victory to the public as creating 2 smaller "monopolies" from one larger one, so their liberal backers will be happy. They will also have achieved a main goal of the litigation- forcing tech companies to contribute more money to Democrats. The ones who should really worry are competitors faced with invigorated agile innovative post break up MSFT. This is a bit ironic since they helped jump start the DOJ case.