Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1446)	5/3/2000 3:25:00 PM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2255

1.81 last trade - some interesting - I aonts ure whether to buy or sell. A new bid hell I even antied up when management was niot supporting the price

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1446)	5/3/2000 3:44:00 PM
From: RJ2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2255

Won't they (PFN) need to get their ni/cu grades up so it won't effect the gravy (PGM) part of the equation?? Some nice intersections but she'll cut into the overall cost of doing business. More drilling is needed to make this area economical!! lol

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1446)	5/3/2000 3:45:00 PM
From: Bruce Robbins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2255

I agree that PFN's drill program was successful (13 hits in 13 holes). IMO the sellers right now are concerned about hole number 9- that hole seems to indicate the zone narrows at depth (Hole 1 61.90m @ 1.83; Hole 9 17.90 m @ 2.71). Too bad PFN doesn't have more holes at depth to disprove this back-of-the-envelope theory the sellers seem to have in their minds. The 17.90 m in hole 9 is still a good intersection. Expectations were perhaps high on this play.