SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckey who wrote (1502)5/4/2000 8:51:00 PM
From: Buckey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2255
 
Short position BIG per Stockwatch
Short History for PFN
Report Date Volume Change
1999-12-09 30,500 30,500
1999-12-21 5,500 -25,000
2000-01-07 5,500 0
2000-01-20 10,000 4,500
2000-02-07 23,631 13,631
2000-02-22 11,981 -11,650
2000-03-06 11,711 -270
2000-03-21 109,600 97,889
2000-04-07 350,264 240,664
2000-04-20 447,090 96,826



To: Buckey who wrote (1502)5/5/2000 1:20:00 PM
From: Ptaskmaster  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2255
 
Claude Cormier and all:

I'm apparently missing some important mineralogical point here, but can someone enlighten me as to why PFN news releases persist in labeling gold (Au) as a Platinum Group Metal (PGM)? The statement is clear, "PGM (Pt + Pd + Au + Rh)" and so used throughout their news releases.

Is it stupidity, incompetence, misrepresentation, a rewriting of the English language or just a rearrangement of the periodic table of the elements?

I've seen arguments that gold is no longer valuable, a barbarous relic akin to the base metals. But none arguing that it is a platinum group metal.

And just saying so doesn't make it so.

Ptask


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News