SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: I. N. Vester who wrote (19524)5/5/2000 6:10:00 PM
From: J. M. Burr  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 27311
 
Wrong, I am not angry. I am patient. I am playing with other people's money, and have been for more than a year. As of this moment my holding is rather substantial. When I say I feel sorry for others who have lost money on VLNC, I mean it. When I say Lev should do more to keep stockholders apprised of ongoing events, I mean it. He certainly could inform the public on Hanil's progress. He could provide flesh to the bare bones of the Irish operation. He could discuss the patents in a generalized fashion. He could inform the public when the financials will be published. He could provide a broad o overview of the Mexican operation, and the battery market, and he could do all the above without giving away trade secrets or pumping the stock. It is perhaps because in my early years I had a background in marketing that I feel so strongly that a company must remain in the public eye. When you don't go public, IT APPEARS THAT YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE If you recall, many many months ago I wrote that who the Hell knew if the Henderson operation was a glorified Potemkin village. And, no one knew! Now, thank God, we have a much better picture of that operation thanks to the company. To conclude, and I won't beat this drum again, I am bullish on VLNC, I play the ups and downs, but the damned company could fold tomorrow and I would be none the wiser today.