Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Pluvia's Fist.com - Pluvia's Plays & Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirRealist who wrote (572)	5/6/2000 8:18:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1766

Anyone who thinks that they can influence a stock is grossly negligent..Unless a person disseminates conjecture and unproven projections, the market as a whole will and cannot rely on such statements. It is my firm belief that by being an NASD member "people" can and do make fraudulent projections under the protection ofd being a registered person,, all the whil the tiny print ,protects them as they merrily sell into their buy reco's, and buy into their downgrades. It is a FRAUD that has yet to be examined,and doesnt appear to be soon forthcoming, since we as a group ,somehow have come to accept these frauds as acceptable. TJ..is no difft than SG cowen..and he no difft than Bear Stearns..the only difference is that one is licenced and wealthy and the other is ugly and unlicensed, yet both do the exact same thing.. The tragedy is that we excuse The Firms and white shoe bullshitters but we torch the average joe who figures this out.. I'm all for slamming TJ..he screwed up and he took people for a ride.( I led this crusade ).but we should now turn our attention to the example that allowed him to operate.