Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: haqihana who wrote (18369)	5/7/2000 6:12:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Michael, would you please explain the misunderstanding to haqi, I am having trouble here. He mis-typed something, and is unable to see how it caused confusion. These are the posts that contain the actual event that you got mixed up with the idea of me saying that you accused ME of reporting someone to SI. Message 13600760 Message 13607404 What he WROTE, and I answered is this: <<<I never accused you of reporting anyone to SI. I never have done such a thing>> I believe, though, he is still reading his words as "I never reported you to SI or threatened to," and so can't understand why I said of COURSE you never accused me of reporting anyone to SI, haqi! He needs to understand that or will go on and on in this way. You could explain it in PM, maybe. I see that there are six messages and a raft of PM's in my inbox. You guys may get rid of me simply because this is ridiculous: I can't even make you see, haqi, that you mis-typed something, and that caused confusion on my part. This makes it all feel a bit worse than its former hopeless! It has become ludicrous. And I'm going away on Wednesday for a couple or three days. So you should relax-- you will be able to continue your lying abuse uncontradicted by its object. haqi: I wrote this to you last night on the subject of my impression that you were suggesting that you might report me to SI: Oh, btw! I am so please to hear that after your review of ALL THE POSTS you "decided" that the "reactions" from you that "will be appropriate to get the matter settled" isn't trying to get me kicked off SI! What a silly mistake I made! Do excuse me! How nice that I have nothing to worry about on that score!... So let me reiterate: I am so glad, haqi, that your checking on all the posts and deciding what is appropriate from you in order to settle the matter wasn't a reference to possibly getting some sort of retribution or other! So very glad! It is quite excellent, really. Thanks! What HAVE you decided would be appropriate from you after review all the posts in order to get the matter settled, btw? Maybe you answer this in one of the other posts to me that's in my inbox, i'll go see. BTW, re your gentlemanly "old woman" insult? I suppose you do know (well, of course, that's why you said it) that a woman of a certain age does dislike having her face rubbed in the fact that she has passed the days of her greatest beauty! But my dear grandchildren are worth it-- and perhaps you and I shall meet some day. There will be a surprise for you in that, I suspect.