Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TATRADER GIZZARD STUDY--Stocks 12.00 or Less..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SnowShredder who wrote (16469)	5/8/2000 12:02:00 PM
From: SnowShredder	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 59879

I think I spoke too soon, my broker just called me back and said that they confused the order with the other order, and that the order on Friday was not executed. They called the MM (NITE) and they said that they were obligated to fill 200 shares which they did, and didn't have to fill the rest due to the "Manning Rule" & that the market closed? Sounds fishy to me...my broker wasn't familiar with it, he said he will do some research on the rule, and see if he can find out if the MM claim is legit, & will try to bust them if possible. All I've found so far about the Manning Rule is that with limit order the MM can't trade ahead of the client...til the limit order is filled. I guess my fill @ 20 7/8 this morning stands unless I hear otherwise. Has anyone heard of the Manning Rule? Thanks. Best of Luck, Where'd He Go?