SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (19070)5/10/2000 11:56:00 PM
From: brk  Respond to of 28311
 
Great post Ron, as always. EOM



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (19070)5/11/2000 12:16:00 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 28311
 
Hi Ron--Hoped you'd be here to help with the technicals.... Also thought I'd posted this Fools article earlier...but didn't...thought the email arrangement between a company and the site was a good concept...also the last two sentences in this article...
KLP

fool.com

Another Down Day!
And the experience that we're gaining
By Jeff Fischer (TMF Jeff)
May 10, 2000

Following today's 5.5% decline, the Nasdaq Composite is 34% below its recent record high. This is great news for some Fools. Those who didn't begin investing until after 1987, you no longer must hear those Wise windbags pontificate that "people investing today [insert hacking cough] don't even know what a stock market decline is all about!"

That's no longer true. Everyone investing today now knows.

So, what do declining stocks mean to you now that you've experienced it? Will you spend less money on your entertainment and meals? Will you cancel your two week jaunt overseas? Will you sell your clothes on eBay? What about your cat?

Hopefully, declining stocks won't mean any of these things to you. Hopefully, you are only investing money that you won't need for another five years or longer. You haven't invested cat food money, or money that you need to buy clothes this fall. You've only invested hard-core savings. Likewise, you have not borrowed too much money using margin to buy stocks. As long as you haven't done these things, the decline is something that you will simply wait out as long as you believe in the value of your investments. Declines are a natural part of the process.

"Yeah, yeah," you may be saying, "quit blabbering. Where is David Gardner with his follow-up article on Excite@Home (Nasdaq: ATHM) like he promised?"

Yes, yesterday David began to discuss our most beleaguered holding, Excite@Home. Today he was going to continue. Instead, yesterday's column resulted in an e-mail from Excite@Home and the arrangement of correspondence between us and them.

We're going to talk with Excite@Home's Executive Vice President of Consumer Broadband Services and Chief Marketing Officer, Mr. Byron Smith, tonight, and we will share our correspondence with you in this column tomorrow. Essentially, David has taken some of the thoughts that he was going to write about tonight, presented them to Byron Smith instead, and tomorrow we will have not only David's questions, but Mr. Smith's answers, too.

Much better, no? I think so. If you own Excite@Home, this should be insight-giving. If you don't own the stock (like me), perhaps you'll start to discover a new opportunity to purchase it at lower prices.

So, Excite@Home's Byron Smith will "be" here tomorrow.

Now, back to today.

There is no explanation for the stock market's behavior, just like we don't try to explain the stock market when it rises sharply on many days. It simply fell today.

You'll hear all of the usual "reasons" behind the decline from news sources that deliver the same reasoning again and again: "Concerns about interest rates made stocks fall." The next day: "Interest rate relief made stocks rise." And ad nauseum. Generally, this is all noise. Nobody knows what will happen next, and nobody knows exactly why today "happened." Does this uncertainty worry you? Don't let it. If you have your health, family, friends, freedom, and you ate today, you have more than so many other people.

Stocks, meanwhile, will simply rise and fall -- and then rise again, sometimes years later.

There is something to celebrate right now, however, if you're invested in the Nasdaq. You are a seasoned veteran of declines now -- congratulations! A year from now, we might see T-shirt's saying, "I survived the fall of 2000." Consider this running tally from Reuters:

Ten largest Percent Decreases on Nasdaq

Date Percentage Decline
10/19/87 -11.35%
04/14/00 -9.67
10/20/87 -9.00
10/26/87 -9.00
08/31/98 -8.56
04/03/00 -7.64
04/12/00 -7.06
04/10/00 -7.06
10/27/97 -7.02
03/27/80 -6.15

Four of the Nasdaq's largest single-day declines in history took place in April. Today's 5.5% decline didn't make the list. Maybe we will tomorrow. Or maybe not. (As I wrote in Drip Port today, if stocks continue to decline at this rate every day, we'll be at 0 in a number of weeks!)

In the bluster of today's decline, some good news for companies and investors in the online world crossed the wires: the U.S. House approved a 5-year Internet tax moratorium (bravo for Amazon, and so many others).

Meanwhile, keep yer wits about ya and enjoy your time on this blue Earth.

Fool on!

--Jeff Fischer, TMF Jeff on the boards.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (19070)5/11/2000 2:30:00 AM
From: tahoe_bound  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 28311
 
Ron R.

In a market panic you can throw all technicals out the window. This is looking more and more like a panic after todays carnage all over, yet the VIX (put option gauge indicating fear) is still only at 34. In 1998 it got all the way up to 60. In 1987, worse than that. Many large issues are starting to break down, this could mean some kind of end to the carnage is out there since the large caps usually are the last to tank at correction or bear market ends. Also, the ARMS index is near 10 year levels indicating possible near washout levels. On the other hand, many of the large caps are breaking head and shoulder necklines, in fact the whole computer index did so today for example, and the telecom index is about to. The downside measurements in those cases are at much lower levels still. This has the sickening possibility of getting way worse than most anyone thinks. The election outcome could be determined this spring or summer at this rate. Usually it is the year after an election that has a bad historical track record, but this market has been breaking all the rules for a long time now anyways.

In 1998 I had the misfortune of owning some oil service stocks and never fully recovered since. The bollingers and stick supports were supposed to hold there as well, but the whole group became enveloped and overwhelmed by too much to hold. A lot of them wound up down 80% and more and stayed there for nearly a year. Not saying that has to happen here, but the last time the Fed tried to engineer a soft landing in 1994, the average p/e for the S&P 500 was below 20. It is still close to 30 here, with the fed funds rate closing in on the '94 level.

I agree that a rally could come out of nowhere, that is common in bear markets. However, if the nasdaq falls another 500 pts. or so, do you really think the low 30's will hold up here? This has done nothing but outpace the general tech collapse, to wit down 28% in the last 2 days. I think too many now are counting on the "Fed Tuesday" to be the big turning point. Problem is, when too many expect it, like Bollinger and the rest fully expected the April 4 first downleg to be a major low, that is precisely the time to be the most cautious. The market will promptly start looking forward to the next Fed meeting in June.

By the way no one answered my earlier question about why Russ or Keister never bothered to attend the large and influential Chase H&Q Technology conference this week, or any other in recent memory. Is it too much to ask that this company go and make presentations in very important forums that increase exposure, at a minimal cost? I don't get it and never will.